Samsung WB150F vs Sony WX1
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
96 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Samsung WB150F vs Sony WX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 149g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Announced August 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB150F vs Sony WX1 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Samsung WB150F versus Sony WX1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Samsung and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the WB150F (14MP) and WX1 (10MP) and the WB150F (1/2.3") and WX1 (1/2.4") come with different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WB150F was launched 2 years later than the WX1 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera and the Sony WX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the WB150F grades versus the WX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung WB150F vs Sony WX1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB150F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung WB150F Gallery & Sony WX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Sony WX1
| WB150F | WX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 30 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony WX1 over the Samsung WB150F
| WX1 | WB150F |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB150F and Sony WX1
| WB150F | WX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Samsung WB150F vs Sony WX1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB150F has got external dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Sony WX1 has dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") and a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung WB150F versus Sony WX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the WB150F vs the WX1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB150F and WX1 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Samsung WB150F vs Sony WX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The visual below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB150F and WX1.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WB150F featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Samsung WB150F will provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The newer WB150F should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Samsung WB150F vs Sony WX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung WB150F vs Sony WX1 Specifications
| Samsung WB150F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB150F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-09 | 2009-08-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 160 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.4-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 188 gr (0.41 lb) | 149 gr (0.33 lb) |
| Dimensions | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-10A | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $230 | $149 |