Samsung WB210 vs Samsung WB800F
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Samsung WB210 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB210 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Samsung WB210 and Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras and both are offered by Samsung. The resolution of the WB210 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly well matched and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WB210 was unveiled 17 months earlier than the WB800F making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summation of how the WB210 grades vs the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung WB210 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB210 and Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are provided at Samsung WB210 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Samsung WB800F
| WB210 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung WB210
| WB800F | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 17 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 1k | Clearer display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB210 and Samsung WB800F
| WB210 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Samsung WB210 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB210 features outer measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Samsung WB210 and Samsung WB800F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the WB210 against the WB800F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB210 and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.
Samsung WB210 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions only by looking at a spec sheet. The image underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WB210 and WB800F.
Clearly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB800F to resolve extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged WB210 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung WB210 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung WB210 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Samsung WB210 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung WB210 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 174 grams (0.38 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | microSC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $279 | $300 |