Clicky

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
45
Overall
40
Samsung WB210 front
 
Sigma DP1 Merrill front
Portability
82
Imaging
56
Features
30
Overall
45

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung WB210
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
  • 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
  • Revealed July 2011
Sigma DP1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • ()mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
  • Announced February 2012
  • Successor is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview

Below is a complete review of the Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Samsung and Sigma. The resolution of the WB210 (14MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty close but the WB210 (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The WB210 was unveiled 6 months earlier than the DP1 Merrill and they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the WB210 scores versus the DP1 Merrill in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill

 WB210 DP1 Merrill 
Screen dimensions3.5""Bigger screen (+3.5")
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Samsung WB210

 DP1 Merrill WB210 
Screen resolution920k1kSharper screen (+919k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB210 and Sigma DP1 Merrill

 WB210 DP1 Merrill 
AnnouncedJuly 2011February 2012Same generation
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB210 offers external dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Sigma DP1 Merrill has proportions of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

Analyze the Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the WB210 against the DP1 Merrill.

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WB210 and DP1 Merrill is 94 and 82 respectively.

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB210 and DP1 Merrill.

As you have seen, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WB210 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will render greater detail having an extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively.

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB210 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma DP1 Merrill as a Portrait photography camera
39
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (14MP)
provides face detection focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
73
has manual focus
resolution is good (15 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Samsung WB210 Street photography factors
Sigma DP1 Merrill Street photography factors
66
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides focus by touch
lighter than average in class (174 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
64
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB210 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP1 Merrill as a Sports photography camera
38
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
48
resolution is good (15MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
can't change focal length (()mm)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB210 Travel photography info
Sigma DP1 Merrill Travel photography info
71
lighter than average in class (174g)
provides focus by touch
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (288mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
54
resolution is good (15MP)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
doesn't have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung WB210
Landscape photography with Sigma DP1 Merrill
46
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
bigger than average screen (3.5")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
50
has manual focus
resolution is good (15MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen ( inch)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB210 Vlogging information
Sigma DP1 Merrill Vlogging information
33
rather wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
lighter than average in class (174 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic support
22
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB210 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
 Samsung WB210Sigma DP1 Merrill
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sigma
Model type Samsung WB210 Sigma DP1 Merrill
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2011-07-19 2012-02-08
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 15 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4320 x 3240 4704 x 3136
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Max boosted ISO 3200 -
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-288mm (12.0x) ()
Max aperture f/2.9-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focusing range 5cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3.5 inches -
Display resolution 1k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs -
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.50 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) 640 x 480
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 174 gr (0.38 pounds) 330 gr (0.73 pounds)
Physical dimensions 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage microSC/SDHC, Internal -
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $279 $1,250