Clicky

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
45
Overall
40
Samsung WB210 front
 
Sigma DP3 Merrill front
Portability
83
Imaging
56
Features
33
Overall
46

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung WB210
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
  • 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
  • Revealed July 2011
Sigma DP3 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 75mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
  • Announced January 2013
  • Superseded the Sigma DP2 Merrill
Photography Glossary

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview

Following is a thorough analysis of the Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sigma. The resolution of the WB210 (14MP) and the DP3 Merrill (15MP) is very well matched but the WB210 (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The WB210 was announced 17 months earlier than the DP3 Merrill making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the WB210 scores versus the DP3 Merrill when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Sigma DP3 Merrill

 WB210 DP3 Merrill 
Display dimension3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Samsung WB210

 DP3 Merrill WB210 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013July 2011More modern by 17 months
Display resolution920k1kSharper display (+919k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB210 and Sigma DP3 Merrill

 WB210 DP3 Merrill 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Samsung WB210 enjoys outer dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Sigma DP3 Merrill has specifications of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

Look at the Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the WB210 versus the DP3 Merrill.

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB210 and DP3 Merrill is 94 and 83 respectively.

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WB210 and DP3 Merrill.

Clearly, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WB210 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Sigma DP3 Merrill will give greater detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged WB210 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill sensor size comparison

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB210 Portrait photography highlights
Sigma DP3 Merrill Portrait photography highlights
39
has manual focus
good MP (14 megapixels)
has face detect focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
73
you can focus manually
good resolution (15 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung WB210
Street photography with Sigma DP3 Merrill
66
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports focus via touch
lighter than others in class (174 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
65
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Samsung WB210
Sports photography with Sigma DP3 Merrill
38
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
44
good resolution (15MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (75mm)
max frames per second very slow (4.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB210 Travel photography features
Sigma DP3 Merrill Travel photography features
71
lighter than others in class (174g)
supports focus via touch
good MP (14MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
great zoom (288mm)
no Timelapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.9)
54
good resolution (15MP)
missing Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB210 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma DP3 Merrill as a Landscape photography camera
46
has manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
big screen (3.5")
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
lack of manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Timelapse mode
55
you can focus manually
good sized screen (3")
good resolution (15MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (75mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
missing Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB210 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP3 Merrill as a Vlogging camera
33
decently wide (24mm)
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
lighter than others in class (174g)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
does not contain selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone port
22
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung WB210 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB210 and Sigma DP3 Merrill
 Samsung WB210Sigma DP3 Merrill
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung WB210 Sigma DP3 Merrill
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2011-07-19 2013-01-08
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 15MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4320 x 3240 4704 x 3136
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Max enhanced ISO 3200 -
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-288mm (12.0x) 75mm (1x)
Max aperture f/2.9-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs -
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs -
Continuous shutter speed - 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.50 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) 640 x 480
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 174g (0.38 pounds) 330g (0.73 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage microSC/SDHC, Internal -
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $279 $1,353