Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Revealed April 2012
- Succeeded the Sigma SD1
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Samsung WB210 and Sigma SD1 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sigma. The image resolution of the WB210 (14MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively comparable but the WB210 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) use different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WB210 was launched 8 months prior to the SD1 Merrill and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the WB210 grades vs the SD1 Merrill with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB210 and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The complete galleries are available at Samsung WB210 Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
WB210 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Samsung WB210
SD1 Merrill | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2012 | July 2011 | More modern by 8 months | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 1k | Clearer screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB210 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
WB210 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Samsung WB210 comes with outer measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Sigma SD1 Merrill has specifications of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Check out the Samsung WB210 and Sigma SD1 Merrill in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the WB210 versus the SD1 Merrill.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB210 and SD1 Merrill is 94 and 57 respectively.
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by going through specifications. The image below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WB210 and SD1 Merrill.
To sum up, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WB210 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will produce more detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged WB210 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Samsung WB210 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung WB210 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2012-04-10 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4800 x 3200 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 174 gr (0.38 lbs) | 790 gr (1.74 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | microSC/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $279 | $2,339 |