Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD9
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Released November 2002
- Renewed by Sigma SD10
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Samsung WB210 and Sigma SD9, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the WB210 (14MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the WB210 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WB210 was announced 8 years later than the SD9 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the WB210 grades versus the SD9 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB210 & Sigma SD9. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung WB210 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Sigma SD9
WB210 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | November 2002 | Fresher by 106 months | |
Display size | 3.5" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.7") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Samsung WB210
SD9 | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 130k | 1k | Crisper display (+129k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB210 and Sigma SD9
WB210 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB210 enjoys outside dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Sigma SD9 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung WB210 and Sigma SD9 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the WB210 vs the SD9.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the WB210 and SD9 is 94 and 54 respectively.
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The photograph here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WB210 and SD9.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WB210 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Samsung WB210 will resolve more detail with its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent WB210 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB210 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Samsung WB210 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung WB210 | Sigma SD9 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2268 x 1512 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.5" | 1.8" |
Resolution of screen | 1 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 174 gr (0.38 pounds) | 950 gr (2.09 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | microSC/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $279 | $3,001 |