Samsung WB210 vs Sony A390
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Samsung WB210 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Superseded the Sony A380
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB210 vs Sony A390 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Samsung WB210 and Sony A390, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB210 (14MP) and the A390 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the WB210 (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WB210 was unveiled 12 months later than the A390 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the WB210 scores versus the A390 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung WB210 vs Sony A390 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB210 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The full galleries are provided at Samsung WB210 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Sony A390
| WB210 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 12 months |
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Samsung WB210
| A390 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Clearer screen (+229k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB210 and Sony A390
| WB210 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Samsung WB210 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB210 has got outside measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB210 and Sony A390 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the WB210 and the A390.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB210 and A390 is 94 and 66 respectively.
Samsung WB210 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through a spec sheet. The visual underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WB210 and A390.
Clearly, both of these cameras feature the identical megapixel count albeit not the same sensor measurements. The WB210 offers the tinier sensor which is going to make getting bokeh harder. The more recent WB210 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung WB210 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung WB210 vs Sony A390 Specifications
| Samsung WB210 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB210 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2010-07-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 1 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 174 gr (0.38 pounds) | 549 gr (1.21 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 230 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | microSC/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $279 | $500 |