Samsung WB210 vs Sony QX30
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
91 Imaging
44 Features
37 Overall
41
Samsung WB210 vs Sony QX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
- Revealed September 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung WB210 vs Sony QX30 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Samsung WB210 and Sony QX30, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Lens-style by companies Samsung and Sony. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the WB210 (14MP) and QX30 (20MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WB210 was brought out 4 years earlier than the QX30 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the WB210 grades vs the QX30 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung WB210 vs Sony QX30 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB210 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung WB210 Gallery & Sony QX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Sony QX30
| WB210 | QX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | " | Larger display (+3.5") |
| Display resolution | 1k |  | 0k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Samsung WB210
| QX30 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 38 months |
Common features in the Samsung WB210 and Sony QX30
| WB210 | QX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Samsung WB210 vs Sony QX30 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Samsung WB210 comes with external measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Sony QX30 has specifications of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB210 and Sony QX30 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the WB210 compared to the QX30.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB210 and QX30 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Samsung WB210 vs Sony QX30 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specs. The picture here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WB210 and QX30.
All in all, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony QX30 to produce extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged WB210 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Samsung WB210 vs Sony QX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung WB210 vs Sony QX30 Specifications
| Samsung WB210 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB210 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Lens-style |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2014-09-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5 inch | - |
| Resolution of screen | 1k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | None |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 174g (0.38 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | microSC/SDHC, Internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $279 | $348 |