Samsung WB210 vs Sony T99
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
96 Imaging
37 Features
27 Overall
33
Samsung WB210 vs Sony T99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Introduced July 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung WB210 vs Sony T99 Overview
Following is a complete comparison of the Samsung WB210 versus Sony T99, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB210 (14MP) and the T99 (14MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WB210 was revealed 13 months after the T99 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera and the Sony T99 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the WB210 matches up versus the T99 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung WB210 vs Sony T99 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB210 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung WB210 Gallery & Sony T99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Sony T99
| WB210 | T99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 13 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Samsung WB210
| T99 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Crisper screen (+229k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB210 and Sony T99
| WB210 | T99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Samsung WB210 vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB210 features physical dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Sony T99 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Samsung WB210 versus Sony T99 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the WB210 versus the T99.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WB210 and T99 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Samsung WB210 vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes just by reviewing specs. The image here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WB210 and T99.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures although you may want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The newer WB210 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB210 vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Samsung WB210 vs Sony T99 Specifications
| Samsung WB210 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB210 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2010-07-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 174 gr (0.38 pounds) | 121 gr (0.27 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSC/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $279 | $179 |