Samsung WB210 vs Sony W220
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Samsung WB210 vs Sony W220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
- 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung WB210 vs Sony W220 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Samsung WB210 vs Sony W220, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB210 (14MP) and the W220 (12MP) is fairly comparable and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WB210 was released 2 years after the W220 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the WB210 scores versus the W220 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung WB210 vs Sony W220 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB210 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung WB210 Gallery & Sony W220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Sony W220
| WB210 | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 31 months |
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Samsung WB210
| W220 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Crisper display (+229k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB210 and Sony W220
| WB210 | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Samsung WB210 vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB210 offers outside dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Sony W220 has proportions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
See the Samsung WB210 vs Sony W220 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the WB210 versus the W220.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the WB210 and W220 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Samsung WB210 vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by going through technical specs. The pic here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB210 and W220.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB210 to provide greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The younger WB210 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Samsung WB210 vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung WB210 vs Sony W220 Specifications
| Samsung WB210 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB210 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | f/2.8-7.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 1s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 7.10 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 174 gr (0.38 pounds) | 147 gr (0.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSC/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $279 | $160 |
