Samsung WB2200F vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
82 Imaging
56 Features
30 Overall
45
Samsung WB2200F vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Announced February 2012
- Renewed by Sigma DP2 Merrill
Samsung WB2200F vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Samsung WB2200F versus Sigma DP1 Merrill, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sigma. The resolution of the WB2200F (16MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is fairly comparable but the WB2200F (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WB2200F was launched 24 months later than the DP1 Merrill making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the WB2200F scores vs the DP1 Merrill for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung WB2200F vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB2200F & Sigma DP1 Merrill. The complete galleries are available at Samsung WB2200F Gallery & Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
WB2200F | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | February 2012 | More recent by 24 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Samsung WB2200F
DP1 Merrill | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB2200F and Sigma DP1 Merrill
WB2200F | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Samsung WB2200F vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Samsung WB2200F has external dimensions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") having a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP1 Merrill has sizing of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung WB2200F versus Sigma DP1 Merrill in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the WB2200F and the DP1 Merrill.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB2200F and DP1 Merrill is 59 and 82 respectively.
Samsung WB2200F vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB2200F and DP1 Merrill.
As you can tell, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WB2200F because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Samsung WB2200F will show greater detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more recent WB2200F should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB2200F vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB2200F vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
Samsung WB2200F | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung WB2200F | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-01-07 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 20-1200mm (60.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | - |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 200k dot | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) | 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 708g (1.56 lbs) | 330g (0.73 lbs) |
Dimensions | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP-1410 | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SCXC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $599 | $1,250 |