Samsung WB2200F vs Sony HX200V
Portability
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Portability
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
Samsung WB2200F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Revealed January 2014
Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Released May 2012
- Replaced the Sony HX100V
- Newer Model is Sony HX300
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung WB2200F vs Sony HX200V Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Samsung WB2200F vs Sony HX200V, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB2200F (16MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is very similar and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WB2200F was brought out 21 months after the HX200V making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the WB2200F grades vs the HX200V in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung WB2200F vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB2200F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The entire galleries are available at Samsung WB2200F Gallery and Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Sony HX200V
| WB2200F | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | May 2012 | Newer by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Samsung WB2200F
| HX200V | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB2200F and Sony HX200V
| WB2200F | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung WB2200F has exterior measurements of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") and a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has sizing of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") along with a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Compare the Samsung WB2200F vs Sony HX200V in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the WB2200F compared to the HX200V.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the WB2200F and HX200V is 59 and 66 respectively.
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WB2200F and HX200V.
Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Sony HX200V to deliver extra detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more recent WB2200F is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung WB2200F as a Portrait photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
MP count decent (16MP)
comes with face detection focus
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
manual focus
decent MP (18MP)
features face detection focus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung WB2200F as a Street photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than others (708g)
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (583 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sports photography with Samsung WB2200F
Sports photography with Sony HX200V
long zoom range (20-1200mm 60.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
great zoom range (27-810mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (18MP)
features tracking autofocus
great battery pack (450 shots)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Samsung WB2200F Travel photography information
Sony HX200V Travel photography information
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (20mm)
very long reach (1200mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than others (708 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
great battery pack (450 per charge)
decent MP (18 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (27mm)
long zoom (810mm)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (583 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung WB2200F Landscape photography features
Sony HX200V Landscape photography features
focusing manually
reasonably wide (20mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
manual focus
rather wide (27mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (18MP)
great battery pack (450 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung WB2200F Vlogging highlights
Sony HX200V Vlogging highlights
reasonably wide (20mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of external mic support
heavier than others (708g)
rather wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (583g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony HX200V Specifications
| Samsung WB2200F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB2200F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2012-05-11 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 18MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 20-1200mm (60.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dot | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) | 12.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 708 grams (1.56 pounds) | 583 grams (1.29 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 450 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP-1410 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SCXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $599 | $480 |