Samsung WB2200F vs Sony S2100
59 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
93 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony S2100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Launched January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung WB2200F vs Sony S2100 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Samsung WB2200F versus Sony S2100, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WB2200F (16MP) and S2100 (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WB2200F was unveiled 4 years after the S2100 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony S2100 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the WB2200F scores vs the S2100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung WB2200F vs Sony S2100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB2200F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung WB2200F Gallery & Sony S2100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Sony S2100
| WB2200F | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 | January 2010 | Newer by 49 months | |
| Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S2100 over the Samsung WB2200F
| S2100 | WB2200F |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB2200F and Sony S2100
| WB2200F | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony S2100 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB2200F offers physical measurements of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") having a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs) whilst the Sony S2100 has proportions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB2200F versus Sony S2100 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the WB2200F and the S2100.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB2200F and S2100 is 59 and 93 respectively.
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony S2100 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specs. The pic underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WB2200F and S2100.
All in all, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB2200F to produce extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer WB2200F is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony S2100 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony S2100 Specifications
| Samsung WB2200F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB2200F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 20-1200mm (60.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200k dot | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/8s | 1s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 708 gr (1.56 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP-1410 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SCXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $599 | $0 |