Samsung WB2200F vs Sony T900
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung WB2200F vs Sony T900 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Samsung WB2200F and Sony T900, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Samsung and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the WB2200F (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WB2200F was released 4 years after the T900 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the WB2200F matches up vs the T900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung WB2200F vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB2200F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung WB2200F Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Sony T900
| WB2200F | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 60 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Samsung WB2200F
| T900 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung WB2200F and Sony T900
| WB2200F | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB2200F has exterior measurements of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") and a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs) and the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Samsung WB2200F and Sony T900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the WB2200F vs the T900.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB2200F and T900 is 59 and 96 respectively.
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specs. The image underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WB2200F and T900.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Samsung WB2200F to show extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer WB2200F is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Samsung WB2200F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB2200F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 20-1200mm (60.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dots | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 708 grams (1.56 lb) | 143 grams (0.32 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP-1410 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SCXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $599 | $300 |