Samsung WB2200F vs Sony W320
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung WB2200F vs Sony W320 Overview
Following is a extended review of the Samsung WB2200F vs Sony W320, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB2200F (16MP) and the W320 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WB2200F was released 4 years after the W320 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the WB2200F matches up vs the W320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung WB2200F vs Sony W320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB2200F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The complete galleries are available at Samsung WB2200F Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Sony W320
| WB2200F | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 49 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Samsung WB2200F
| W320 | WB2200F |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB2200F and Sony W320
| WB2200F | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Samsung WB2200F features outer dimensions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") having a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has specifications of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung WB2200F vs Sony W320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the WB2200F versus the W320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB2200F and W320 is 59 and 97 respectively.
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by researching specs. The image underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the WB2200F and W320.
All in all, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB2200F to result in more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The fresher WB2200F will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung WB2200F vs Sony W320 Specifications
| Samsung WB2200F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB2200F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-01-07 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 20-1200mm (60.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200k dot | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/8s | 1s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 708g (1.56 lb) | 117g (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | BP-1410 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SCXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $599 | $269 |