Samsung WB250F vs Samsung WB30F
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Samsung WB250F vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung WB250F vs Samsung WB30F Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Samsung WB250F versus Samsung WB30F, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both designed by Samsung. The resolution of the WB250F (14MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WB250F was launched at a similar time to the WB30F and they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the WB250F scores against the WB30F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Samsung WB250F vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB250F and Samsung WB30F. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung WB250F Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Samsung WB30F
| WB250F | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Samsung WB250F
| WB30F | WB250F |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB250F and Samsung WB30F
| WB250F | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Similar generation |
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Samsung WB250F vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB250F has outer measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Samsung WB250F versus Samsung WB30F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the WB250F compared to the WB30F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WB250F and WB30F is 93 and 96 respectively.
Samsung WB250F vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by reviewing technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WB250F and WB30F.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Samsung WB30F to deliver more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively.
Samsung WB250F vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung WB250F vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Samsung WB250F | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung WB250F | Samsung WB30F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) | 128 gr (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $250 | $180 |
