Clicky

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A390

Portability
93
Imaging
38
Features
44
Overall
40
Samsung WB250F front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front
Portability
66
Imaging
54
Features
54
Overall
54

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A390 Key Specs

Samsung WB250F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Sony A390
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Revealed July 2010
  • Superseded the Sony A380
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A390 Overview

Lets look a bit more in depth at the Samsung WB250F vs Sony A390, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB250F (14MP) and the A390 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the WB250F (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) use totally different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The WB250F was introduced 2 years later than the A390 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple view of how the WB250F scores vs the A390 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Sony A390

 WB250F A390 
RevealedJanuary 2013July 2010Fresher by 30 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Samsung WB250F

 A390 WB250F 
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Samsung WB250F and Sony A390

 WB250F A390 
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Samsung WB250F has got outer dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

Check out the Samsung WB250F vs Sony A390 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the WB250F vs the A390.

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A390 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the WB250F and A390 is 93 and 66 respectively.

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing purely by seeing specs. The photograph here might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WB250F and A390.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizing. The WB250F has got the smaller sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field trickier. The newer WB250F will have an advantage in sensor technology.

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB250F Portrait photography info
Sony A390 Portrait photography info
36
resolution is good (14MP)
has face detect autofocus
no manual focus
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
72
manual focus
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has face detect focus
saves RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Samsung WB250F Street photography advice
Sony A390 Street photography advice
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (226g)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
76
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB250F as a Sports photography camera
Sony A390 as a Sports photography camera
52
long zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
60
image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with phase detect auto focus
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
terrible battery (230 per charge)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Samsung WB250F
Travel photography with Sony A390
69
lighter than competitors in class (226 grams)
resolution is good (14MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
very long reach (432mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
53
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
terrible battery (230 per charge)
display isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB250F Landscape photography features
Sony A390 Landscape photography features
44
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
61
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (14MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
tiny screen (2.7")
terrible battery (230 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB250F Vlogging factors
Sony A390 Vlogging factors
35
relatively wide (24mm)
touch screen
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (226g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have mic support
9
no video
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A390 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB250F and Sony A390
 Samsung WB250FSony Alpha DSLR-A390
General Information
Brand Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB250F Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2013-01-07 2010-07-28
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 4592 x 3056
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 24-432mm (18.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.8 -
Available lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 460 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 16s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 8.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 226 gr (0.50 pounds) 549 gr (1.21 pounds)
Dimensions 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 66
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 607
Other
Battery life - 230 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FH50
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $250 $500