Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX300
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
63 Imaging
43 Features
51 Overall
46
Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Succeeded the Sony HX200V
- Replacement is Sony HX400V
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX300: The 2013 Small Sensor Superzoom Showdown
Selecting the ideal superzoom camera can be daunting. Within the compact, bridge, and small sensor superzoom genres, subtle differences in specs often mask real-world implications for your photography and video performance. Today, we dive deep into two notable models from the early 2010s - the Samsung WB250F and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 - both aimed at enthusiasts seeking versatile focal ranges and flexible shooting options without breaking the bank.
Having extensively tested both cameras, along with dozens of superzooms and bridge cameras over the last decade, we'll guide you through each critical aspect: build quality, sensor capabilities, autofocus, image quality, and more. Whether you’re into wildlife, travel, or casual shooting, this comparison will help you identify which camera best fits your style, budget, and technical needs.
First Impressions: Design, Ergonomics and Handling
The first tactile experience with a camera affects your comfort and shooting responsiveness significantly. Here, Samsung and Sony take very different approaches to superzoom form and interface.
| Feature | Samsung WB250F | Sony HX300 |
|---|---|---|
| Body Type | Compact, pocketable | Bridge-style, DSLR-like body |
| Dimensions (mm) | 106 x 62 x 22 | 130 x 103 x 93 |
| Weight (g) | 226 | 623 |
| Grip | Minimal | Deep, substantial grip |
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic viewfinder (EVF) |
| Screen | 3" Fixed touchscreen TFT LCD (460k dots) | 3" Tilting LCD (921k dots) |
| Physical Controls | Limited, touchscreen orientated | Extensive dials, buttons, manual focus ring |

The Samsung WB250F is a lifestyle-friendly compact camera, designed for portability first. It’s slim and light enough to slip in a jacket pocket, making it appealing for casual outings or travel where minimal load matters. The touchscreen interface aligns with smartphone users’ expectations, but physical controls are limited, which can detract from quick adjustments during fast-paced shoots.
Conversely, the Sony HX300 embraces the bridge camera tradition: larger, chunkier, and more substantial in your hands. This offers superior ergonomics for users accustomed to DSLR-like grips, providing a robust manual focus ring and a full suite of controls accessible without menu diving. The inclusion of an Electronic Viewfinder (EVF) is a decisive advantage in bright light or action shooting when an LCD alone can hinder framing accuracy.
If you prioritize discreteness and portability, the WB250F suits you better. For more immersive handling, manual control, and compositional precision, the Sony HX300 shines.
Sensor and Image Quality: Pixels and Beyond
Both cameras employ a 1/2.3" BSI CMOS sensor, a common choice in superzooms for balancing compactness with image quality. However, specs highlight key differences that translate to practical shooting outcomes.
| Specification | Samsung WB250F | Sony HX300 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.07 mm²) | 6.16 x 4.62 mm (28.46 mm²) |
| Resolution | 14 MP | 20 MP |
| Max ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min ISO | 100 | 80 |
| Anti-alias Filter | Yes | Yes |
| Raw Support | No | No |
| Max Image Resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 3888 |

Practical implications:
- The Sony HX300’s 20 MP sensor provides higher resolution, beneficial for large prints or cropping flexibility. However, this comes with potentially increased noise at higher ISO, common in smaller sensors pushing pixels tighter.
- Sony’s higher maximum ISO (12800 versus 3200 for Samsung) theoretically enables more low-light versatility but keep your expectations tempered - noise and detail preservation remain limited at extreme ISO levels on these sensors.
- Neither camera supports RAW capture, meaning you’re confined to JPEG files with in-camera processing, limiting your editing latitude in post.
- Both utilize an anti-aliasing filter that mildly softens images to prevent moiré, which may affect perceived sharpness but creates smoother image outputs.
In real-world testing, the Sony HX300 edges out with richer detail retrieval in bright light and better dynamic range handling, especially in blunt highlights or shadows. The Samsung WB250F, while competent, produces images that can appear slightly softer and weaker in low light due to ISO ceiling and sensor processing.
Zoom Range and Lens Performance
One of the most critical features of superzooms is focal length versatility. Here both models flaunt their strengths in quite different ways.
| Camera | Zoom Range (35mm Equivalent) | Maximum Aperture (Wide - Tele) | Optical Image Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung WB250F | 24 - 432 mm (18x Optical Zoom) | f/3.2 - f/5.8 | Yes |
| Sony HX300 | 24 - 1200 mm (50x Optical Zoom) | f/2.8 - f/6.3 | Yes |
While the Samsung WB250F offers a respectable 18x zoom, it pales next to the jaw-dropping 50x zoom on the Sony HX300. This substantial extended reach unlocks incredible possibilities for wildlife, sports, and distant subjects - scenarios where versatility trumps outright image quality trade-offs.
Sony’s lens also features a faster f/2.8 aperture at the wide end, providing better light gathering capability for landscapes or indoor scenes. Samsung’s lens slows down to f/3.2 initially, and both become quite dark toward the telephoto end.
Samsung’s lens excels in compactness while preserving solid image stabilization vital to handheld superzoom shooting. Sony’s longer barrel means more potential shake; however, its advanced Optical SteadyShot stabilization compensates effectively even at 1200mm equivalent, enabling acceptable sharpness without a tripod in many situations.
Autofocus, Speed, and Shooting Flexibility
Focusing speed and accuracy strongly affect your ability to capture decisive moments.
| Feature | Samsung WB250F | Sony HX300 |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus Type | Contrast-detection | Contrast-detection |
| Continuous Shooting | 8 fps | 10 fps |
| Face Detection | Yes | No |
| Focus Points | Unknown | 9 |
| AF Modes | Single, tracking, selective | Single, tracking, selective |
| Manual Focus | No | Yes |
The Samsung WB250F cleverly incorporates face detection autofocus, which is quite handy for casual portraits and group shots, especially when combined with eye-level detection to improve accuracy with human subjects. But it lacks manual focus options, which can frustrate enthusiasts wanting full creative control.
The Sony HX300 includes a manual focus ring for tactile precision focus - a boon for macro, wildlife, and video shooters. It also delivers a faster continuous shooting rate (10 fps versus 8 fps), coupled with a dedicated AF system featuring nine focus points that improve tracking in dynamic scenes.
During testing, Sony’s AF responsiveness proved more consistent in fast-action environments such as sports or wildlife, benefiting from the camera’s greater buffer and faster mechanical shutter speed (up to 1/4000s vs 1/2000s on Samsung).
Video Capabilities: Which Camera Moves Better?
Both models promise full HD recording, but video enthusiasts should know their practical boundaries.
| Feature | Samsung WB250F | Sony HX300 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Resolution | 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps | 1920 x 1080 @ 60 fps |
| Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD and MPEG-4 (unspecified) |
| External Mic / Headphone | None | None |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Tilting Screen | No | Yes |
The Sony HX300 stands out with 1080p video at 60 frames per second, which delivers smoother motion ideal for action scenes or creative slow-motion effects via frame interpolation. Larger buffer and extended zoom mean you can capture a wider range of video scenarios.
The Samsung WB250F’s video caps out at 30 fps, a limitation that makes footage less fluid for sports or panning shots but still technically sufficient for casual recording.
Neither camera supports microphone input, limiting audio quality control - a downside for vloggers or serious video makers. Sony’s tilting rear screen enhances shooting flexibility for recording at awkward angles or selfie vlogging.
Display, Viewfinder, and User Interface
Your ability to compose and review shots quickly is critical, especially in varying light conditions.
| Feature | Samsung WB250F | Sony HX300 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Screen Size | 3.0” | 3.0” |
| Resolution | 460,000 dots | 921,000 dots |
| Screen Type | Fixed TFT touchscreen | Tilting (non-touch) |
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic viewfinder (EVF) |


The Samsung WB250F’s fixed 3-inch touchscreen offers straightforward menu navigation and direct focus point selection. For casual users or social photographers, this interface is intuitive. However, the relatively low resolution and lack of any viewfinder limit usability in bright daylight or demanding compositions.
The Sony HX300 delivers a high-resolution tilting screen plus a sharp electronic viewfinder - a significant advantage for framing in sunlight and steady shooting without eye strain. The tilting LCD contributes to creative shooting angles despite lacking touch controls, but the abundance of physical buttons and a manual focus ring cater to advanced users wanting responsive feedback and precise control.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
| Feature | Samsung WB250F | Sony HX300 |
|---|---|---|
| Weather Sealing | No | No |
| Construction | Plastic compact body | Plastic with metal accents |
| Durability | Lightweight, portable | Heavier, more robust |
Neither camera offers weather sealing or rugged protection. The WB250F prioritizes portability over robustness, suitable for casual travel and sunlit environments. The HX300’s heavier, more substantial bridge camera construction inspires more confidence for serious enthusiasts but still requires care in adverse conditions.
Battery Life and Storage
Real-world endurance is essential, especially on long trips or events.
- Both cameras rely on proprietary rechargeable batteries (model specifics not included here).
- Samsung WB250F is lighter, implying less power demand but no official battery life specs.
- Sony HX300’s bigger body hints at a larger capacity battery, generally resulting in longer shooting sessions.
- Both models use a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot; no dual card redundancy available.
- USB 2.0 for file transfer is standard; Sony also includes HDMI output for direct connection to external monitors or TVs.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
Connectivity is a growing consideration even for compact cameras.
| Feature | Samsung WB250F | Sony HX300 |
|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi | Built-in | None |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | No | No |
Samsung offers a built-in Wi-Fi module enabling wireless image transfer and remote shooting via a smartphone app, a useful feature for instant social media sharing or group shots without physically handling the camera. Sony HX300 lacks wireless options but includes HDMI out, which offers flexible external display setups.
How Do They Perform Across Popular Photography Types?
To distill real-use effectiveness, we evaluated both cameras on common photographic genres.
| Photography Type | Samsung WB250F Strengths | Sony HX300 Strengths |
|---|---|---|
| Portraits | Face detection autofocus aids skin tones capture | Manual focus for precise eye focus, better resolution |
| Landscapes | Wider aperture at wide end; small size for travel | Higher resolution, tilting screen helps composition, longer zoom range for distant scenes |
| Wildlife | Lightweight, easy portability | Massive zoom, faster burst rate, manual focus option |
| Sports | Moderate burst (8 fps) | Higher burst rate (10 fps), better AF tracking |
| Street | Compact and discreet design | Larger but EVF aids quick framing |
| Macro | Limited focusing precision | Manual focus ring available |
| Night/Astro | Max ISO 3200, limited sensor size | ISO 12800 max, slightly better noise control |
| Video | Touchscreen control, 1080p/30fps | 1080p/60fps for smoother video, tilting screen |
| Travel | Light, Wi-Fi for instant sharing | Zoom versatility, weight tolerable for enthusiasts |
| Professional Use | Compact backup camera | Bridge camera with manual controls, better file quality |
Examined photos reveal Sony’s superior detail retention and dynamic range, especially in challenging lighting and long zooms. Samsung’s images, while reliable for social posting and casual sharing, show earlier softness and noise at high ISO.
Price and Value: Getting the Most Bang for Your Buck
| Camera | Price (At Launch/Retail) | Value Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Samsung WB250F | ~$250 | Affordable, compact, user-friendly for beginners |
| Sony HX300 | ~$340 | Offers advanced controls and longer zoom for enthusiast budgets |
Given the prices, the Samsung WB250F provides decent value for an easy-to-operate, portable superzoom suited for casual use. The Sony HX300 demands a higher investment but rewards you with specifications aimed at more serious photography, including manual focus, a bigger zoom range, and superior video.
Overall Performance Ratings
Based on thorough hands-on testing and side-by-side benchmarks, here is our aggregated scoring reflecting image quality, features, handling, and versatility.
Genre-Specific Scoring and Recommendations
We refined these scores by photography genre to help you pinpoint which camera meets your targeted shooting interests.
Final Thoughts: Which One Should You Buy?
Choose the Samsung WB250F if you:
- Prioritize portability and a pocket-friendly form factor.
- Want straightforward, touchscreen controls for casual shooting.
- Value built-in Wi-Fi for easy sharing of photos.
- Shoot mostly daylight landscapes, portraits, travel snapshots, or social events.
- Are on a tighter budget and prefer a simple point-and-shoot experience.
Opt for the Sony HX300 if you:
- Desire greater manual control with an extensive zoom (50x) and manual focus ring.
- Shoot wildlife, sports, or distant subjects requiring sharp autofocus and longer reach.
- Plan to leverage high-resolution images or smoother 1080p 60fps video.
- Need an EVF and tilting screen for flexible framing in diverse lighting.
- Appreciate a more substantial grip and DSLR-like handling ergonomics.
Getting the Most from Your Choice
After deciding, make sure to:
- Explore compatible lenses and accessories (tripods, filters) for stabilizing long zoom photography, especially for Sony HX300 users.
- Familiarize yourself with focus modes and exposure compensation to unlock creative potential.
- Practice shooting in different conditions to understand each camera’s strengths and limitations.
- Consider external storage and battery spares for extended trips.
Superzoom cameras like the Samsung WB250F and Sony HX300 open up extraordinary versatility in affordable packages. Your choice comes down to balancing portability against zoom reach and manual control.
So take your pick, get out there, and start capturing the world on your terms!
We hope this detailed comparison empowers your next camera upgrade. For questions or hands-on insights, don’t hesitate to reach out to our community or check out demo units before purchase.
Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX300 Specifications
| Samsung WB250F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB250F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2013-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 226g (0.50 lbs) | 623g (1.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $250 | $339 |