Clicky

Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX300

Portability
93
Imaging
38
Features
44
Overall
40
Samsung WB250F front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
44
Features
51
Overall
46

Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Samsung WB250F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2013
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Introduced February 2013
  • Succeeded the Sony HX200V
  • Replacement is Sony HX400V
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX300 Overview

Below is a thorough comparison of the Samsung WB250F and Sony HX300, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Samsung and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the WB250F (14MP) and HX300 (20MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The WB250F was manufactured at a similar time to the HX300 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the WB250F matches up against the HX300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

				

Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Sony HX300

 WB250F HX300 
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Samsung WB250F

 HX300 WB250F 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution921k460kSharper screen (+461k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB250F and Sony HX300

 WB250F HX300 
IntroducedJanuary 2013February 2013Similar age
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB250F has physical dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony HX300 has proportions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

Check the Samsung WB250F and Sony HX300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the WB250F against the HX300.

Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB250F and HX300 is 93 and 63 respectively.

Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements just by going over a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB250F and HX300.

Clearly, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Sony HX300 to offer you more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively.

Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB250F Portrait photography factors
Sony HX300 Portrait photography factors
36
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
provides face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
42
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Samsung WB250F Street photography info
Sony HX300 Street photography info
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (226g)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
50
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (623g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB250F Sports photography factors
Sony HX300 Sports photography factors
52
excellent zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
55
long zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
has tracking focus
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB250F Travel photography advice
Sony HX300 Travel photography advice
69
lighter than average in class (226 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
great zoom (432mm)
does not have Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
54
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (1200mm)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (623g)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB250F Landscape photography factors
Sony HX300 Landscape photography factors
44
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
48
focusing manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB250F Vlogging factors
Sony HX300 Vlogging factors
35
reasonably wide (24mm)
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (226g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external microphone port
25
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (623g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB250F and Sony HX300
 Samsung WB250FSony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung WB250F Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2013-01-07 2013-02-20
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Max resolution 4320 x 3240 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 3200 12800
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-432mm (18.0x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.8 f/2.8-6.3
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dot 921 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Features
Minimum shutter speed 16 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 8.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 226g (0.50 lbs) 623g (1.37 lbs)
Dimensions 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes -
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $250 $339