Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX99
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
91 Imaging
45 Features
67 Overall
53
Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3-inch Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 242g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Announced September 2018
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX99 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX99, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the WB250F (14MP) and HX99 (18MP) and the WB250F (1/2.3") and HX99 (1/2.3-inch) boast different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WB250F was unveiled 6 years prior to the HX99 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the WB250F matches up vs the HX99 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX99 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB250F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung WB250F Gallery and Sony HX99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Sony HX99
| WB250F | HX99 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX99 over the Samsung WB250F
| HX99 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2018 | January 2013 | Newer by 68 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Samsung WB250F and Sony HX99
| WB250F | HX99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3.00" | Equal screen measurement | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX99 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung WB250F comes with physical measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony HX99 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") with a weight of 242 grams (0.53 lbs).
Check out the Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX99 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the WB250F compared to the HX99.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB250F and HX99 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX99 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by viewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WB250F and HX99.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WB250F having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony HX99 will result in extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged WB250F will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX99 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung WB250F vs Sony HX99 Specifications
| Samsung WB250F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB250F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2018-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3-inch |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.5-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.00 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 638 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 226 grams (0.50 lb) | 242 grams (0.53 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $250 | $469 |