Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX100 V
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
89 Imaging
52 Features
80 Overall
63
Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX100 V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Revealed October 2016
- Succeeded the Sony RX100 IV
- Replacement is Sony RX100 VI
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX100 V Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX100 V, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the WB250F (14MP) and RX100 V (20MP) and the WB250F (1/2.3") and RX100 V (1") boast totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WB250F was brought out 4 years prior to the RX100 V and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 V being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the WB250F grades against the RX100 V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX100 V Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB250F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung WB250F Gallery & Sony RX100 V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Sony RX100 V
| WB250F | RX100 V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 V over the Samsung WB250F
| RX100 V | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2016 | January 2013 | More recent by 45 months | |
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1229k | 460k | Crisper screen (+769k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Samsung WB250F and Sony RX100 V
| WB250F | RX100 V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size |
Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX100 V Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung WB250F provides exterior dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 V has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
See the Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX100 V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the WB250F versus the RX100 V.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the WB250F and RX100 V is 93 and 89 respectively.
Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX100 V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The graphic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB250F and RX100 V.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WB250F featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony RX100 V will give you greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older WB250F is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX100 V Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung WB250F vs Sony RX100 V Specifications
| Samsung WB250F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB250F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2016-10-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 315 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/1.8-2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 1,229k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 24.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) | 299 gr (0.66 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 586 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $250 | $998 |