Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX1
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced August 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX1 Overview
The following is a in-depth analysis of the Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Samsung and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the WB250F (14MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the WB250F (1/2.3") and TX1 (1/2.4") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WB250F was released 3 years after the TX1 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the WB250F grades versus the TX1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB250F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The complete galleries are available at Samsung WB250F Gallery & Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Sony TX1
| WB250F | TX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 42 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Samsung WB250F
| TX1 | WB250F |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB250F and Sony TX1
| WB250F | TX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB250F features outside measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony TX1 has measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the WB250F compared to the TX1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WB250F and TX1 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading specs. The pic below might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WB250F and TX1.
All in all, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WB250F due to its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung WB250F will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The younger WB250F is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX1 Specifications
| Samsung WB250F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB250F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2009-08-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 2s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1250s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) | 142 gr (0.31 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $250 | $350 |