Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX9
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40


95 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Launched July 2010

Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX9 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX9, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB250F (14MP) and the TX9 (12MP) is very comparable and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The WB250F was released 2 years after the TX9 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the WB250F scores against the TX9 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX9 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB250F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung WB250F Gallery & Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Sony TX9
WB250F | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Samsung WB250F
TX9 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB250F and Sony TX9
WB250F | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung WB250F offers outside dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony TX9 has sizing of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX9 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the WB250F and the TX9.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB250F and TX9 is 93 and 95 respectively.

Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions merely by going through a spec sheet. The picture below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WB250F and TX9.
As you can see, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB250F to produce more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more modern WB250F is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB250F vs Sony TX9 Specifications
Samsung WB250F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB250F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2013-01-07 | 2010-07-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.80 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 226 gr (0.50 lbs) | 149 gr (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $250 | $799 |