Samsung WB250F vs Zeiss ZX1
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
67 Imaging
77 Features
62 Overall
71
Samsung WB250F vs Zeiss ZX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 37MP - Full frame Sensor
- 4.34" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 51200
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 35mm (F2-22) lens
- 800g - 142 x 93 x 46mm
- Launched September 2018
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung WB250F vs Zeiss ZX1 Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Samsung WB250F vs Zeiss ZX1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Zeiss. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the WB250F (14MP) and ZX1 (37MP) and the WB250F (1/2.3") and ZX1 (Full frame) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WB250F was unveiled 6 years earlier than the ZX1 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera and the Zeiss ZX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the WB250F scores vs the ZX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung WB250F vs Zeiss ZX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB250F & Zeiss ZX1. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung WB250F Gallery & Zeiss ZX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Zeiss ZX1
| WB250F | ZX1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Zeiss ZX1 over the Samsung WB250F
| ZX1 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2018 |  | January 2013 | Fresher by 69 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 4.34" |  | 3" | Larger display (+1.34") |
| Display resolution | 2765k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+2305k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB250F and Zeiss ZX1
| WB250F | ZX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Samsung WB250F vs Zeiss ZX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Samsung WB250F comes with outside dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Zeiss ZX1 has sizing of 142mm x 93mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") along with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB250F vs Zeiss ZX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the WB250F compared to the ZX1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB250F and ZX1 is 93 and 67 respectively.
Samsung WB250F vs Zeiss ZX1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through technical specs. The graphic here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WB250F and ZX1.
As you have seen, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WB250F using its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Zeiss ZX1 will resolve extra detail having an extra 23MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older WB250F is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB250F vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung WB250F vs Zeiss ZX1 Specifications
| Samsung WB250F | Zeiss ZX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Zeiss |
| Model | Samsung WB250F | Zeiss ZX1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2018-09-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 36 x 24mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 864.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 37 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 7488 x 4992 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 51200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 255 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2-22 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 4.34 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 2,765k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 6,221k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) | 800 grams (1.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 142 x 93 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | 512GB internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $250 | - |