Samsung WB30F vs Sony A9
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fee81/fee81e019f95a3bb973073789d3f212cc23f50fb" alt="Samsung WB30F front Samsung WB30F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb915/fb9150a0825a8aaa926eeef450260349d0062f8d" alt="Sony Alpha A9 front Sony Alpha A9 front"
65 Imaging
73 Features
93 Overall
81
Samsung WB30F vs Sony A9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Boost to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 673g - 127 x 96 x 63mm
- Launched April 2017
- Updated by Sony A9 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Samsung WB30F vs Sony A9 Overview
Here is a in-depth analysis of the Samsung WB30F and Sony A9, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Samsung and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the WB30F (16MP) and A9 (24MP) and the WB30F (1/2.3") and A9 (Full frame) boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The WB30F was released 5 years before the A9 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera and the Sony A9 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the WB30F grades vs the A9 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Samsung WB30F vs Sony A9 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB30F & Sony Alpha A9. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung WB30F Gallery & Sony A9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Sony A9
WB30F | A9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A9 over the Samsung WB30F
A9 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2017 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 52 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1440k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+1210k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung WB30F and Sony A9
WB30F | A9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Samsung WB30F vs Sony A9 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB30F enjoys exterior measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sony A9 has proportions of 127mm x 96mm x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs).
Compare the Samsung WB30F and Sony A9 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the WB30F vs the A9.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c09d/9c09d306fea31ad58a67cf8a677b02aa762105d4" alt="Samsung WB30F vs Sony A9 size comparison Samsung WB30F vs Sony A9 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB30F and A9 is 96 and 65 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55d88/55d88ed3005fe4b06f7fd9ac3be903948e8878a9" alt="Samsung WB30F vs Sony A9 top view buttons comparison Samsung WB30F vs Sony A9 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB30F vs Sony A9 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing only by reviewing specifications. The visual here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WB30F and A9.
Plainly, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WB30F because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Sony A9 will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The older WB30F is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcc54/bcc541988bd21ba05b6a5adf01309f0267004c5f" alt="Samsung WB30F vs Sony A9 sensor size comparison Samsung WB30F vs Sony A9 sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB30F vs Sony A9 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73708/73708e1b357846d6f103c9d6317064b6f4ebdc07" alt="Samsung WB30F vs Sony A9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB30F vs Sony A9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Samsung WB30F vs Sony A9 Specifications
Samsung WB30F | Sony Alpha A9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB30F | Sony Alpha A9 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2017-04-19 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 51200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 693 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | QVGA TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 20.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 128 gr (0.28 lbs) | 673 gr (1.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 127 x 96 x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 92 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 650 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Storage slots | One | Two |
Launch pricing | $180 | $4,498 |