Samsung WB30F vs Sony A350
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Samsung WB30F vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Released June 2008
- Updated by Sony A380
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung WB30F vs Sony A350 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Samsung WB30F versus Sony A350, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB30F (16MP) and the A350 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the WB30F (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WB30F was launched 4 years later than the A350 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the WB30F matches up vs the A350 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Samsung WB30F vs Sony A350 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB30F & Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung WB30F Gallery & Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Sony A350
| WB30F | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | June 2008 | More recent by 56 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Samsung WB30F
| A350 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Samsung WB30F and Sony A350
| WB30F | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Samsung WB30F vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung WB30F has external dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Sony A350 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung WB30F versus Sony A350 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the WB30F and the A350.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WB30F and A350 is 96 and 62 respectively.
Samsung WB30F vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements only by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB30F and A350.
As you can see, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WB30F featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Samsung WB30F will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent WB30F should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung WB30F vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung WB30F vs Sony A350 Specifications
| Samsung WB30F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB30F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2008-06-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | QVGA TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 128 gr (0.28 lb) | 674 gr (1.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 595 |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $180 | $600 |