Samsung WB30F vs Sony A390
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
66 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53
Samsung WB30F vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Released July 2010
- Old Model is Sony A380
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung WB30F vs Sony A390 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Samsung WB30F and Sony A390, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB30F (16MP) and the A390 (14MP) is very comparable but the WB30F (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WB30F was manufactured 2 years after the A390 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the WB30F grades vs the A390 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung WB30F vs Sony A390 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB30F and Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung WB30F Gallery and Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Sony A390
| WB30F | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | July 2010 | More modern by 30 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Samsung WB30F
| A390 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Samsung WB30F and Sony A390
| WB30F | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Samsung WB30F vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Samsung WB30F has physical measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Sony A390 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") and a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the Samsung WB30F and Sony A390 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the WB30F versus the A390.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB30F and A390 is 96 and 66 respectively.
Samsung WB30F vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes purely by seeing technical specs. The picture below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WB30F and A390.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WB30F due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Samsung WB30F will provide extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The newer WB30F will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Samsung WB30F vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung WB30F vs Sony A390 Specifications
| Samsung WB30F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB30F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2010-07-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | QVGA TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 128g (0.28 lbs) | 549g (1.21 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 607 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 230 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $180 | $500 |