Samsung WB30F vs Sony H300
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Samsung WB30F vs Sony H300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
- 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Introduced February 2014
Photography Glossary Samsung WB30F vs Sony H300 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Samsung WB30F versus Sony H300, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB30F (16MP) and the H300 (20MP) is pretty comparable and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WB30F was manufactured 13 months earlier than the H300 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera and the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the WB30F grades against the H300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung WB30F vs Sony H300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB30F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung WB30F Gallery & Sony H300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Sony H300
| WB30F | H300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Samsung WB30F
| H300 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2013 | Fresher by 13 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB30F and Sony H300
| WB30F | H300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Samsung WB30F vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Samsung WB30F enjoys physical dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sony H300 has specifications of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") and a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).
Compare the Samsung WB30F versus Sony H300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the WB30F and the H300.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WB30F and H300 is 96 and 63 respectively.
Samsung WB30F vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB30F and H300.
As you can see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Sony H300 to provide more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The older WB30F will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung WB30F vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung WB30F vs Sony H300 Specifications
| Samsung WB30F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB30F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/3-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | QVGA TFT LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201 thousand dot |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.80 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 128 gr (0.28 pounds) | 590 gr (1.30 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $180 | $249 |