Clicky

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP1x

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42
Samsung WB350F front
 
Sigma DP1x front
Portability
88
Imaging
44
Features
27
Overall
37

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP1x Key Specs

Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Announced January 2014
Sigma DP1x
(Full Review)
  • 5MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 320 x 240 video
  • 28mm (F4.0) lens
  • 250g - 113 x 60 x 50mm
  • Launched February 2010
  • Replaced the Sigma DP1s
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP1x Overview

Following is a in depth comparison of the Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP1x, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the WB350F (16MP) and DP1x (5MP) and the WB350F (1/2.3") and DP1x (APS-C) possess totally different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The WB350F was revealed 3 years after the DP1x which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1x being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the WB350F scores vs the DP1x when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Sigma DP1x

 WB350F DP1x 
LaunchedJanuary 2014February 2010More modern by 48 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma DP1x over the Samsung WB350F

 DP1x WB350F 

Common features in the Samsung WB350F and Sigma DP1x

 WB350F DP1x 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP1x Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung WB350F provides physical measurements of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP1x has sizing of 113mm x 60mm x 50mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.0") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).

Look at the Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP1x in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the WB350F vs the DP1x.

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP1x size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB350F and DP1x is 90 and 88 respectively.

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP1x top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP1x Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizes only by going through specifications. The image underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WB350F and DP1x.

To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WB350F using its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Samsung WB350F will show extra detail because of its extra 11MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern WB350F will have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP1x sensor size comparison

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP1x Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP1x Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB350F as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma DP1x as a Portrait photography camera
40
manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
56
you can focus manually
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
megapixel count low (5 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Samsung WB350F Street photography factors
Sigma DP1x Street photography factors
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (276g)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
68
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition (250 grams)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB350F Sports photography info
Sigma DP1x Sports photography info
50
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
32
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (5MP)
lacks phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB350F Travel photography highlights
Sigma DP1x Travel photography highlights
69
lighter than others in class (276g)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
57
lighter than competition (250 grams)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (5 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f4.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB350F as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma DP1x as a Landscape photography camera
50
manual focus
relatively wide (23mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
41
you can focus manually
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
slow max aperture (f4.0)
screen is small (2.5 inches)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (5 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB350F as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP1x as a Vlogging camera
34
relatively wide (23mm)
touch screen
image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (276g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone port
25
lighter than competition (250 grams)
slow max aperture (f4.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (320 x 240 pixels)
missing mic jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP1x Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB350F and Sigma DP1x
 Samsung WB350FSigma DP1x
General Information
Make Samsung Sigma
Model type Samsung WB350F Sigma DP1x
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2014-01-07 2010-02-20
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - True II
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 5MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 2640 x 1760
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 23-483mm (21.0x) 28mm (1x)
Max aperture f/2.8-5.9 f/4.0
Crop factor 5.8 1.7
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 2.5 inches
Screen resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 16 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 320 x 240
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 320x240
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 276 gr (0.61 pounds) 250 gr (0.55 pounds)
Dimensions 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") 113 x 60 x 50mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID SLB-10A -
Self timer - Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC SD/MMC card
Storage slots One One
Launch price $260 $574