Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70455/70455b470de7a381df26b21e53c60bdd7569f00d" alt="Samsung WB350F front Samsung WB350F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13eba/13eba33ccbe166c59c9f9853741b21ecd136ed99" alt="Sigma DP2s front Sigma DP2s front"
86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Launched February 2010
- Replaced the Sigma DP2
- Renewed by Sigma DP2x
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the WB350F (16MP) and DP2s (5MP) and the WB350F (1/2.3") and DP2s (APS-C) feature totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The WB350F was unveiled 3 years later than the DP2s and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2s being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the WB350F matches up versus the DP2s when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB350F and Sigma DP2s. The full galleries are available at Samsung WB350F Gallery and Sigma DP2s Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Sigma DP2s
WB350F | DP2s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 48 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2s over the Samsung WB350F
DP2s | WB350F |
---|
Common features in the Samsung WB350F and Sigma DP2s
WB350F | DP2s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB350F has got outer measurements of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Sigma DP2s has dimensions of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") and a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Look at the Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the WB350F versus the DP2s.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dc7d/7dc7d13705782afe5d0ba8a0d29a9a4e583af894" alt="Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s size comparison Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB350F and DP2s is 90 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c514/3c51463bf720b8e6d41605fefe3822e18c934045" alt="Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s top view buttons comparison Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by viewing specs. The graphic below should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WB350F and DP2s.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WB350F having a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Samsung WB350F will render more detail having an extra 11MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos much more aggressively. The younger WB350F is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/628fb/628fb7bf5a660c4a275d1bb7164458ec3bf2f102" alt="Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s sensor size comparison Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22907/2290782348206a5f9cd57472d894ebdeb324fec6" alt="Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma DP2s Specifications
Samsung WB350F | Sigma DP2s | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung WB350F | Sigma DP2s |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | True II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 50 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 41mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 15s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.30 m |
Flash settings | - | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 276g (0.61 pounds) | 280g (0.62 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-10A | - |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $260 | $940 |