Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70455/70455b470de7a381df26b21e53c60bdd7569f00d" alt="Samsung WB350F front Samsung WB350F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46cfd/46cfd6b1b2504d733a07dd4a231b6abe09baa859" alt="Sigma SD1 Merrill front Sigma SD1 Merrill front"
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Revealed April 2012
- Earlier Model is Sigma SD1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sigma. The image resolution of the WB350F (16MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively similar but the WB350F (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The WB350F was manufactured 22 months later than the SD1 Merrill which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the WB350F grades versus the SD1 Merrill in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB350F and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung WB350F Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
WB350F | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | April 2012 | More recent by 22 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Samsung WB350F
SD1 Merrill | WB350F |
---|
Common features in the Samsung WB350F and Sigma SD1 Merrill
WB350F | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB350F enjoys physical dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has proportions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the WB350F compared to the SD1 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/416fc/416fcc5caf10dc2a95241b045e26b92dddd93eae" alt="Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the WB350F and SD1 Merrill is 90 and 57 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/148fd/148fda18e7b0a209f84c2026b08fb46b86f46d6b" alt="Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements just by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB350F and SD1 Merrill.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WB350F featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Samsung WB350F will offer more detail due to its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher WB350F will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06d0e/06d0e75c2fae2c8345846d5b733b07fbdbfd8f04" alt="Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4afc/f4afcd7fd05244147bef324e0cb36a883e8e128e" alt="Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Samsung WB350F | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung WB350F | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2014-01-07 | 2012-04-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4800 x 3200 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16s | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 276g (0.61 lb) | 790g (1.74 lb) |
Dimensions | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-10A | - |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $260 | $2,339 |