Clicky

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42
Samsung WB350F front
 
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Announced January 2014
Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Revealed April 2012
  • Earlier Model is Sigma SD1
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview

In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sigma. The image resolution of the WB350F (16MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively similar but the WB350F (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The WB350F was manufactured 22 months later than the SD1 Merrill which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the WB350F grades versus the SD1 Merrill in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 WB350F SD1 Merrill 
RevealedJanuary 2014April 2012More recent by 22 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Samsung WB350F

 SD1 Merrill WB350F 

Common features in the Samsung WB350F and Sigma SD1 Merrill

 WB350F SD1 Merrill 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Screen resolution460k460kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to lug around your camera, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB350F enjoys physical dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has proportions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).

Take a look at the Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the WB350F compared to the SD1 Merrill.

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the WB350F and SD1 Merrill is 90 and 57 respectively.

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements just by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB350F and SD1 Merrill.

As you have seen, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WB350F featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Samsung WB350F will offer more detail due to its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher WB350F will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB350F Portrait photography features
Sigma SD1 Merrill Portrait photography features
40
manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
65
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no liveview
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Samsung WB350F Street photography advice
Sigma SD1 Merrill Street photography advice
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (276g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
57
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
weather sealing
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB350F Sports photography factors
Sigma SD1 Merrill Sports photography factors
50
long zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
61
sensor resolution is decent (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
weather sealing
has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB350F Travel photography advice
Sigma SD1 Merrill Travel photography advice
69
lighter than competition (276 grams)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (23mm)
very long reach (483mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
does not contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
54
weather sealing
sensor resolution is decent (15MP)
does not have Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB350F Landscape photography information
Sigma SD1 Merrill Landscape photography information
50
manual focus
relatively wide (23mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
63
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
weather sealing
no liveview
no image stabilization
does not have Time Lapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Samsung WB350F
Vlogging with Sigma SD1 Merrill
34
relatively wide (23mm)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (276g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly display
does not have external mic port
9
no video shooting
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB350F and Sigma SD1 Merrill
 Samsung WB350FSigma SD1 Merrill
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sigma
Model type Samsung WB350F Sigma SD1 Merrill
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Announced 2014-01-07 2012-04-10
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - Dual True II
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 15MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4800 x 3200
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 23-483mm (21.0x) -
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.9 -
Available lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 460k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 96 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Min shutter speed 16s -
Max shutter speed 1/2000s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash modes - no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 276g (0.61 lb) 790g (1.74 lb)
Dimensions 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID SLB-10A -
Self timer - Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $260 $2,339