Clicky

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD10

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42
Samsung WB350F front
 
Sigma SD10 front
Portability
54
Imaging
39
Features
27
Overall
34

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs

Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Announced January 2014
Sigma SD10
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 800 (Boost to 1600)
  • 1/6000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
  • Launched March 2004
  • Succeeded the Sigma SD9
  • Refreshed by Sigma SD14
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD10 Overview

Here, we will be matching up the Samsung WB350F versus Sigma SD10, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the WB350F (16MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the WB350F (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) boast different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The WB350F was released 9 years later than the SD10 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the WB350F scores versus the SD10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Sigma SD10

 WB350F SD10 
LaunchedJanuary 2014March 2004Fresher by 120 months
Screen size3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution460k130kClearer screen (+330k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Samsung WB350F

 SD10 WB350F 

Common features in the Samsung WB350F and Sigma SD10

 WB350F SD10 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB350F provides external dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Sigma SD10 has dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).

Take a look at the Samsung WB350F versus Sigma SD10 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the WB350F compared to the SD10.

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD10 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WB350F and SD10 is 90 and 54 respectively.

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD10 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing merely by seeing specs. The photograph here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB350F and SD10.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WB350F featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Samsung WB350F will provide greater detail as a result of its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger WB350F provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD10 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB350F as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma SD10 as a Portrait photography camera
40
manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
47
focusing manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
sensor resolution low (3MP)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Samsung WB350F as a Street photography camera
Sigma SD10 as a Street photography camera
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (276 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
43
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
heavier than competition (950g)
max ISO too low (800)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Samsung WB350F
Sports photography with Sigma SD10
50
long zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
36
high shutter speed (1/6,000s)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (3MP)
has no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB350F as a Travel photography camera
Sigma SD10 as a Travel photography camera
69
lighter than competition in class (276 grams)
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (23mm)
very long reach (483mm)
does not have Timelapse function
does not have a selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
29
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (950g)
sensor resolution low (3 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB350F Landscape photography factors
Sigma SD10 Landscape photography factors
50
manual focus
decently wide (23mm)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
41
focusing manually
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (1.8")
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (3 megapixels)
max ISO too low (800)
no Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB350F Vlogging advice
Sigma SD10 Vlogging advice
34
decently wide (23mm)
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (276g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly display
does not have external microphone support
9
can't record video
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma SD10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB350F and Sigma SD10
 Samsung WB350FSigma SD10
General Information
Make Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung WB350F Sigma SD10
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Announced 2014-01-07 2004-03-19
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 3MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 2268 x 1512
Maximum native ISO 3200 800
Maximum enhanced ISO - 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 23-483mm (21.0x) -
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.9 -
Available lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 1.8 inch
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dot 130 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 98%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.77x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 16s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/6000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 276 gr (0.61 pounds) 950 gr (2.09 pounds)
Physical dimensions 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model SLB-10A -
Self timer - Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC Compact Flash Type I or II
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $260 $198