Clicky

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42
Samsung WB350F front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Launched January 2014
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Introduced February 2016
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Below is a complete comparison of the Samsung WB350F vs Sigma Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Samsung and Sigma. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the WB350F (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the WB350F (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) provide different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The WB350F was introduced 3 years before the Quattro and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the WB350F matches up versus the Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Sigma Quattro

 WB350F Quattro 
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung WB350F

 Quattro WB350F 
IntroducedFebruary 2016January 2014More recent by 25 months
Screen resolution1620k460kClearer screen (+1160k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB350F and Sigma Quattro

 WB350F Quattro 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB350F enjoys exterior dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Check out the Samsung WB350F vs Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the WB350F and the Quattro.

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WB350F and Quattro is 90 and 63 respectively.

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over a spec sheet. The photograph here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WB350F and Quattro.

Clearly, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WB350F with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Sigma Quattro will deliver extra detail using its extra 13MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older WB350F is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB350F as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
40
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
81
focusing manually
amazing MP (29MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
includes face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung WB350F
Street photography with Sigma Quattro
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (276g)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
59
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
weather proof
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competitors (625 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB350F Sports photography features
Sigma Quattro Sports photography features
50
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
70
amazing MP (29 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proof
supports phase detect autofocus
low frames per second (3.8 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB350F Travel photography details
Sigma Quattro Travel photography details
69
lighter than competitors in class (276g)
good megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (23mm)
very long zoom (483mm)
no Timelapse function
does not offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
55
weather proof
amazing MP (29MP)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (625g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung WB350F
Landscape photography with Sigma Quattro
50
you can focus manually
fairly wide (23mm)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Timelapse function
72
focusing manually
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
amazing MP (29 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
weather proof
lack of image stabilization
lack of Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB350F Vlogging details
Sigma Quattro Vlogging details
34
fairly wide (23mm)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (276 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly display
no microphone socket
22
includes face detection autofocus
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low ( pxls)
lack of external microphone jack
more heavy than competitors (625 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Samsung WB350F vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB350F and Sigma Quattro
 Samsung WB350FSigma sd Quattro
General Information
Make Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung WB350F Sigma sd Quattro
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2014-01-07 2016-02-23
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 29MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 23-483mm (21.0x) -
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.9 -
Number of lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460k dot 1,620k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 16s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed - 3.8fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash settings - no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 276 gr (0.61 lb) 625 gr (1.38 lb)
Physical dimensions 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model SLB-10A BP-61
Self timer - Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $260 $738