Samsung WB350F vs Sony H200
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
67 Imaging
45 Features
31 Overall
39
Samsung WB350F vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Released January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung WB350F vs Sony H200 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Samsung WB350F versus Sony H200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB350F (16MP) and the H200 (20MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe WB350F was brought out 13 months after the H200 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a concise summation of how the WB350F matches up vs the H200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung WB350F vs Sony H200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB350F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The entire galleries are available at Samsung WB350F Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Sony H200
| WB350F | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 13 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Samsung WB350F
| H200 | WB350F |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB350F and Sony H200
| WB350F | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Samsung WB350F vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung WB350F provides physical dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Sony H200 has specifications of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Check out the Samsung WB350F versus Sony H200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the WB350F and the H200.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WB350F and H200 is 90 and 67 respectively.
Samsung WB350F vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing specs. The pic underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB350F and H200.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Sony H200 to result in more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The newer WB350F will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung WB350F vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung WB350F vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Samsung WB350F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB350F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 20cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.80 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 276g (0.61 pounds) | 530g (1.17 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Battery format | - | AA |
| Battery model | SLB-10A | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $260 | $250 |
