Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX200V
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70455/70455b470de7a381df26b21e53c60bdd7569f00d" alt="Samsung WB350F front Samsung WB350F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91d06/91d06e64750ff9ea247ef7d29955562c9a21441b" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front"
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX200V Overview
Lets look closer at the Samsung WB350F and Sony TX200V, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB350F (16MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The WB350F was unveiled 24 months later than the TX200V making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick overview of how the WB350F matches up versus the TX200V when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB350F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The full galleries are available at Samsung WB350F Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Sony TX200V
WB350F | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | More recent by 24 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Samsung WB350F
TX200V | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB350F and Sony TX200V
WB350F | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB350F enjoys exterior measurements of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Samsung WB350F and Sony TX200V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the WB350F versus the TX200V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ca60/1ca602a161e65840ccab26efbc703201494ae2e1" alt="Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX200V size comparison Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX200V size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB350F and TX200V is 90 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e9d7/3e9d79428f8176c8d320b1e9dee76ff10f2689e2" alt="Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements simply by checking out specs. The visual underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WB350F and TX200V.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Sony TX200V to show more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer WB350F will have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59ab7/59ab7f0b2ac69c7d52af822b7ba3cea8ba72b1f2" alt="Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cf2f/5cf2f99c167c8bcfb6c4ab8d1b7155c4bdf9d474" alt="Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Samsung WB350F vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Samsung WB350F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB350F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2012-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 276 grams (0.61 pounds) | 129 grams (0.28 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-10A | NP-BN |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $260 | $500 |