Samsung WB350F vs Sony W610
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42


97 Imaging
37 Features
20 Overall
30
Samsung WB350F vs Sony W610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 113g - 93 x 52 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012

Samsung WB350F vs Sony W610: A Friendly Face-Off for Everyday Shooters and Enthusiasts
When it comes to compact cameras that don’t break the bank but promise a decent zoom range and ease of use, the Samsung WB350F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W610 have long been contenders in the small-sensor compact segment. Both models target casual photographers who want more reach than a smartphone but without the learning curve and bulk of DSLRs or mirrorless systems.
Having extensively tested both cameras over time - putting their sensors, zoom lenses, autofocus, exposure controls, and usability through real-world scenarios - I’m excited to share a detailed comparison. My aim? To help you decide which of these budget-friendly compacts can best serve your photographic whims, whether that’s capturing family portraits, snapping landscapes on vacation, or dabbling in wildlife shots during a walk in the park.
So, let’s dive in, starting with the basics and then peeling back the layers to see where these two cameras impress, and where they - let’s say - leave room for improvement.
Size Matters: Handling and Ergonomics in Daily Use
You don’t want a camera that feels like a brick in your pocket or a slippery bar of soap when shooting one-handed. This is where size and grip come into play.
Here’s an immediate visual comparison: The Samsung WB350F measures a chunkier 114 x 65 x 25 mm and weighs 276 grams, while the Sony W610 is more petite at 93 x 52 x 19 mm and just 113 grams. In practical terms, the Sony feels more pocketable and light - the kind you can forget you’re carrying until the perfect shot pops up. The Samsung, by contrast, offers a sturdier grip, arguably better for stability during long zoom shots or when handheld shooting in tricky light.
On top of raw size, the Samsung sports a fixed, touch-sensitive 3-inch screen, whereas the Sony has a 2.7-inch clear photo TFT (non-touch). More on these displays shortly, but the tactile interface of the WB350F feels more modern and responsive during framing and menu navigation.
The top view further reveals diverging philosophies: Samsung’s layout packs more physical buttons, including dedicated shutter speed and aperture priority modes, plus exposure compensation - features you won’t find on the Sony. The Sony’s simpler array is less intimidating for newbies but sacrifices some creative control.
If you prize ergonomic feel and tactile feedback during shooting, the Samsung is the more comfortable and flexible in-hand companion. But if absolute portability and lightness are your overriding priority, Sony’s W610 wins hands-down.
The Heart of the Matter: Sensor and Image Quality Analysis
No camera conversation is complete without peering inside - the sensor. Both these compacts utilize the same small 1/2.3" sensor size (6.17 x 4.55mm), standard for budget zooms, but with some key differences.
The Samsung WB350F features a 16-megapixel backside-illuminated CMOS sensor, while the Sony W610 relies on a 14-megapixel CCD sensor.
What does this mean practically?
- The BSI-CMOS technology in the Samsung is designed to capture more light, typically delivering better low-light sensitivity and less noise at high ISO settings.
- The CCD sensor in the Sony is a more traditional technology that can produce pleasing color rendition but generally falls short in noise control beyond ISO 400 or 800.
I put both cameras through side-by-side controlled tests under various lighting - from bright daylight landscapes to dim indoor portraits. The Samsung routinely pulled ahead by producing cleaner images at ISO 800 and 1600, with less grain and better shadow detail.
You also get a slight resolution edge with Samsung’s 16MP sensor (4608 x 3456 pixels max) over Sony’s 14MP (4320 x 3240 pixels). While neither sensor size nor megapixels rival contemporary mirrorless or DSLR models, these specs are respectable for casual photography.
Both cameras include an anti-aliasing filter that smoothes out moiré but can subtly limit the sharpness potential.
Image processing aside, the Samsung’s sensor pairing with optical image stabilization (OIS) gives it a practical advantage for handheld shooting, especially at the long end of the zoom.
Viewing and Composing: Screen and Optical Tools
Composing your shot should be intuitive - not a guessing game.
The Samsung WB350F’s touchscreen LCD is a clear winner here: At 3 inches with 460k-dot resolution, it feels bright, responsive, and easy for setting focus points or navigating menus. Touch autofocus and tap-to-capture reduce the hassle, which I appreciated in busy street photography scenarios where fast framing matters.
Meanwhile, the Sony DSC-W610 offers a smaller 2.7-inch screen with 230k-dot resolution - not only smaller but also lacking touch capabilities. The display tends to underperform in bright sunlight, making framing outdoors more challenging. No live histogram or touch AF options here.
Neither camera features an electronic viewfinder, which is common for their class but a bummer for users shooting in intense sunlight. You’re limited to LCD composing, so practicing stable handheld posture helps.
Zoom Range and Lens Capabilities
If you’re hunting for a superzoom to capture everything from wide-angle landscapes to distant subjects, lens reach is vital.
The Samsung WB350F brings a smash hit zoom: 23–483 mm equivalent (21x optical zoom) with an aperture starting at F2.8 wide, narrowing to F5.9 at telephoto. This punchy zoom range embedded in a compact body is impressive and versatile.
The Sony W610 sticks to a more modest 26–105 mm equivalent (4x optical zoom), with the same aperture range as Samsung at wide to telephoto.
How does this translate in real life? The Samsung’s superzoom is a killer feature for travel and wildlife enthusiasts on a budget, letting you sneak up on subjects without switching lenses. However, courtesy of physics and the modest maximum aperture, expect dimmer telephoto shots and potential quality loss due to diffraction, typical for compact superzooms.
The Sony’s zoom flexibility is less aggressive but tends to yield slightly better optical quality within its narrower range - less complexity, fewer compromises.
It’s worth mentioning that neither camera supports interchangeable lenses - they come with fixed zoom lenses only, limiting optical versatility but simplifying operation.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Decisive Moment
If you want to capture fast action, your camera’s autofocus and burst shooting capabilities need to be up to snuff.
Unfortunately, both cameras are not designed with speed demons in mind.
The Samsung WB350F uses a contrast-detection autofocus system only, with no continuous AF or tracking for moving subjects. Focus lock times are decent given the small sensor but can feel sluggish when zoomed in fully. Also, no face or eye detection autofocus is available.
Similarly, the Sony W610 also relies on contrast AF with no continuous or tracking modes. But it offers single AF and somewhat slower shutter speeds with a maximum burst of only 1 fps - not exactly sports camera territory.
For both cameras, neither implements phase-detection autofocus, multi-point focusing, nor sophisticated subject tracking. So for wildlife, sports, or any fast-moving subjects, I wouldn’t count on nailing tack-sharp images consistently.
Manual Control and Exposure Modes: Creative Freedom?
Here’s where Samsung edges ahead for shutterbugs who want more creative input.
The WB350F offers shutter priority, aperture priority, and full manual exposure modes - rare at this price and class. You get exposure compensation, custom white balance, and a decent shutter speed range from 1/16 to 1/2000 sec. This allows some artistic control not often found in budget compacts.
The Sony W610 is more of a point-and-shoot, missing shutter and aperture priority modes, manual exposure, or exposure compensation options. White balance bracketing is available but customizing white balance itself is not - a bit of a letdown.
So, if you like learning the ropes of exposure controls and shaping your image with aperture or shutter speed, Samsung’s hardware is far better suited.
Video Capabilities: Recording Memories in Motion
Video performance is often overlooked but important.
Samsung WB350F shoots 1080p Full HD video at standard frame rates, complete with live view, optical image stabilization, and built-in stereo microphones. It lacks microphone or headphone ports, which is usual for compacts, but its HD video quality is respectable, especially handheld where the OIS helps.
The Sony W610 records only VGA resolution video (640x480) at 30 fps in Motion JPEG format - a far cry from HD or Full HD. Video quality is soft and noisy at best, fitting only casual quick clips or experimentation.
Aside from the resolution, the Sony lacks any form of image stabilization in video mode, making handheld shooting more challenging.
So if video is a factor, Samsung’s WB350F is clearly the winner.
Battery Life and Storage Options: Stamina on the Go
Power endurance can determine whether your camera survives a day trip or clamors for a recharge after every handful of shots.
The Sony W610 uses a battery pack (NP-BN) rated for approximately 250 shots per charge. That’s decent for light usage, but many users will find themselves swapping batteries or carrying spares on longer excursions.
Samsung’s official battery life specs aren’t clearly stated, but with a similarly sized proprietary battery (SLB-10A), expect roughly comparable endurance - likely around 250-300 shots per charge in standard usage. The presence of a touchscreen and Wi-Fi connectivity might impact power consumption slightly.
Regarding storage, Samsung supports MicroSD family cards, whereas Sony offers broader compatibility - SD/SDHC, microSD variants, and even Sony’s proprietary Memory Stick formats - providing more flexibility if you already own multiple card types.
Connectivity and Extra Features: Getting Images Off the Camera
The Samsung WB350F tucks in built-in Wi-Fi with NFC, allowing easy wireless image transfer to smartphones or tablets. This is a very handy feature for casual shooters wanting quick sharing on social platforms without fumbling cables.
Sony W610 lacks any wireless connectivity, relying solely on USB 2.0 for image transfer.
Neither camera offers GPS tagging or HDMI output, which is unsurprising in their category and age.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Will These Cameras Last?
Both models share modest build quality typical of affordable point-and-shoots, with plastic bodies and limited durability enhancements.
Neither the Samsung nor Sony cameras offer any weather sealing, dustproofing, or ruggedization. So if you plan extreme outdoor adventures in rain, snow, or dusty environments, you’ll want better-built hardware or protective cases.
Real-World Test Shots: Who Takes the Cake?
Enough talk - let’s look at use cases, tested shooting scenarios, and sample image quality.
-
Portraits: Samsung’s higher resolution and cleaner high ISO performance help capture skin tones more naturally, although the lack of face detection AF means focusing requires patience. The Sony’s lagging sensor and limited zoom range make portraits less punchy, though its shorter focal length is more comfortable for casual snaps without distortion.
-
Landscapes: Both cameras shoot at wide focal lengths, but Samsung’s 23mm equivalent edges wider than Sony’s 26mm. Combined with higher resolution files, Samsung allows for more cropping and detail retention.
-
Wildlife: Samsung’s extensive zoom wins easily, though autofocus speed remains a limitation for moving beasts. Sony’s zoom isn’t competitive here.
-
Sports: Neither model satisfies; limited burst rates and slow AF mean many missed shots. Consider dedicated action cameras or mirrorless systems instead.
-
Street Photography: Sony’s pocketability aids stealthy shooting, but Samsung’s touch screen speeds focusing. Both cameras lack silent shutter modes.
-
Macro: Sony can focus as close as 4cm, but Samsung’s exact macro distance unspecified. Samsung’s OIS helps stabilize tight close-ups.
-
Night/Astro: Samsung’s BSI sensor shines with better noise control, but both cameras struggle at very high ISO, given small sensor size.
-
Video: Samsung’s 1080p videos have decent clarity and stabilization; Sony’s at VGA barely qualify as video.
-
Travel: Samsung offers versatility via zoom and wireless transfer, but at double the weight. Sony packs light and offers more storage format flexibility.
-
Professional Use: Neither camera meets pro benchmarks but Samsung’s manual controls and resolution offer entry-level creative exploration.
Scoring the Overall Performance
Synthesizing tested attributes into an overall score:
Samsung WB350F holds a clear edge, scoring higher in image quality, versatility, and features. Sony W610 falls short, shining mostly in casual portability and simplicity.
Genre-Specific Performance Snapshot
Here’s how these compacts stack by photography type:
- Portraits: Samsung leads thanks to sensor and controls.
- Landscape: Close contest; Samsung’s zoom edges advantage.
- Wildlife: Samsung’s zoom dominates, despite slow AF.
- Sports: Both insufficient for serious action.
- Street: Sony better for invisibility and ease.
- Macro: Sony’s close focus is slightly better.
- Night/Astro: Samsung’s sensor technology helps.
- Video: Samsung is far superior.
- Travel: Samsung is versatile but heavier, Sony is pocketable.
- Professional: Neither recommended, but Samsung allows limited creative flexibility.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
Who should pick the Samsung WB350F?
- Enthusiasts who want a versatile all-in-one superzoom.
- Those who crave full manual modes and finer exposure control.
- Travelers and family shooters looking for decent video quality.
- Anyone wanting wireless sharing capability without fuss.
Who is the Sony W610 for?
- Budget-conscious buyers wanting the simplest, most portable point-and-shoot.
- Casual photographers who prioritize pocketweight over zoom reach.
- Users who value broad memory card compatibility.
- Novices uninterested in tweaking manual settings or who dislike touchscreens.
And who should look elsewhere?
- Wildlife or sports photographers needing fast autofocus and burst shooting.
- Street photographers wanting silent shooting and discreet design.
- Video-centric users craving HD video plus microphone inputs.
- Professional photographers requiring raw file support and weather sealing.
Capturing candid moments, breathtaking landscapes, or distant wildlife can be rewarding with either camera - so long as expectations fit the gear. My hands-on testing over hundreds of frames confirms Samsung’s WB350F is a smarter pick for photographers seeking more creative control and zoom versatility, while Sony’s W610 offers a no-fuss, pocketable alternative for snapshots and everyday use.
Ultimately, the ideal camera harmonizes with your style, budget, and willingness to embrace its quirks. That’s the joy of photography: the right tool can inspire your eye - whether your “tool” weighs 113 grams or 276.
Happy shooting!
Samsung WB350F vs Sony W610 Specifications
Samsung WB350F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W610 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB350F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W610 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-01-07 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 4cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 276 gr (0.61 lb) | 113 gr (0.25 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 93 x 52 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | SLB-10A | NP-BN |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $260 | $200 |