Clicky

Samsung WB350F vs Sony A68

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42
Samsung WB350F front
 
Sony SLT-A68 front
Portability
64
Imaging
66
Features
70
Overall
67

Samsung WB350F vs Sony A68 Key Specs

Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Announced January 2014
Sony A68
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 610g - 143 x 104 x 81mm
  • Announced November 2015
  • Previous Model is Sony A65
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung WB350F vs Sony A68 Overview

In this write-up, we will be comparing the Samsung WB350F and Sony A68, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sony. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the WB350F (16MP) and A68 (24MP) and the WB350F (1/2.3") and A68 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The WB350F was introduced 22 months earlier than the A68 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera and the Sony A68 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the WB350F matches up against the A68 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Sony A68

 WB350F A68 
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A68 over the Samsung WB350F

 A68 WB350F 
AnnouncedNovember 2015January 2014Newer by 22 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution461k460kCrisper screen (+1k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB350F and Sony A68

 WB350F A68 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Samsung WB350F vs Sony A68 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB350F has outer measurements of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Sony A68 has measurements of 143mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 610 grams (1.34 lbs).

Compare the Samsung WB350F and Sony A68 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the WB350F and the A68.

Samsung WB350F vs Sony A68 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB350F and A68 is 90 and 64 respectively.

Samsung WB350F vs Sony A68 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB350F vs Sony A68 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading a spec sheet. The pic below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WB350F and A68.

As you can see, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The WB350F using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony A68 will offer you extra detail using its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged WB350F is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Samsung WB350F vs Sony A68 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB350F vs Sony A68 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB350F vs Sony A68 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB350F Portrait photography details
Sony A68 Portrait photography details
40
you can focus manually
MP count good (16MP)
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
79
focusing manually
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detection focus
supports RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Samsung WB350F Street photography features
Sony A68 Street photography features
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (276 grams)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
77
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
good ISO range (25,600)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB350F Sports photography info
Sony A68 Sports photography info
50
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports tracking autofocus
supports phase detect auto focus
terrible battery pack (510 per charge)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB350F Travel photography factors
Sony A68 Travel photography factors
69
lighter than others (276g)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
no Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
54
good megapixels (24MP)
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse function
terrible battery pack (510 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung WB350F
Landscape photography with Sony A68
50
you can focus manually
relatively wide (23mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Timelapse mode
67
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
terrible battery pack (510 shots)
lack of Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB350F as a Vlogging camera
Sony A68 as a Vlogging camera
34
relatively wide (23mm)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (276 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
no microphone port
35
image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with external mic jack
display isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Samsung WB350F vs Sony A68 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB350F and Sony A68
 Samsung WB350FSony SLT-A68
General Information
Brand Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB350F Sony SLT-A68
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2014-01-07 2015-11-06
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz X
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 24MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 3200 25600
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 79
Cross focus points - 15
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 23-483mm (21.0x) -
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.9 -
Number of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 460k dot 461k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.57x
Features
Min shutter speed 16 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes - Flash off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Rear sync, Wireless, High Speed sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p, 24p), 1440 x 1080, 640 x 480
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 276 grams (0.61 lbs) 610 grams (1.34 lbs)
Dimensions 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") 143 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 79
DXO Color Depth score not tested 24.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.5
DXO Low light score not tested 701
Other
Battery life - 510 photographs
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model SLB-10A NP-FM500H
Self timer - Yes (Yes (2 or 12 sec))
Time lapse shooting
Storage media MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $260 $581