Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2s
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2s Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Replaced the Sigma DP2
- Replacement is Sigma DP2x
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2s Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Samsung WB35F and Sigma DP2s, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sigma. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the WB35F (16MP) and DP2s (5MP) and the WB35F (1/2.3") and DP2s (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe WB35F was announced 3 years after the DP2s which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2s being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a short view of how the WB35F matches up versus the DP2s in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2s Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB35F & Sigma DP2s. The whole galleries are available at Samsung WB35F Gallery & Sigma DP2s Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sigma DP2s
| WB35F | DP2s | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 48 months |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2s over the Samsung WB35F
| DP2s | WB35F |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sigma DP2s
| WB35F | DP2s | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2s Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB35F provides outside measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2s has measurements of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") with a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung WB35F and Sigma DP2s in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the WB35F versus the DP2s.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WB35F and DP2s is 93 and 86 respectively.
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2s Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by checking specifications. The pic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WB35F and DP2s.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WB35F with its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh tougher and the Samsung WB35F will resolve greater detail with its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively. The more recent WB35F will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2s Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung WB35F vs Sigma DP2s Specifications
| Samsung WB35F | Sigma DP2s | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model type | Samsung WB35F | Sigma DP2s |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2010-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | True II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 5MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 50 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 41mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.30 m |
| Flash modes | - | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 320 x 240 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 320x240 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lb) | 280 gr (0.62 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP70A | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $130 | $940 |