Clicky

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD10

Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37
Samsung WB35F front
 
Sigma SD10 front
Portability
54
Imaging
39
Features
27
Overall
34

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs

Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Sigma SD10
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 800 (Push to 1600)
  • 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
  • Introduced March 2004
  • Old Model is Sigma SD9
  • Newer Model is Sigma SD14
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD10 Overview

In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD10, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the WB35F (16MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the WB35F (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) come with different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The WB35F was manufactured 9 years after the SD10 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick overview of how the WB35F matches up against the SD10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sigma SD10

 WB35F SD10 
IntroducedJanuary 2014March 2004More modern by 120 months
Screen sizing2.7"1.8"Bigger screen (+0.9")
Screen resolution230k130kSharper screen (+100k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Samsung WB35F

 SD10 WB35F 

Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sigma SD10

 WB35F SD10 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Neither comes with Touch screen

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB35F comes with physical dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sigma SD10 has dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).

Check the Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the WB35F against the SD10.

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD10 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB35F and SD10 is 93 and 54 respectively.

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD10 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The image underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WB35F and SD10.

Plainly, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WB35F because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Samsung WB35F will offer extra detail due to its extra 13MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern WB35F should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD10 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB35F Portrait photography highlights
Sigma SD10 Portrait photography highlights
37
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
47
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
MP count low (3 megapixels)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung WB35F
Street photography with Sigma SD10
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
43
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
heavier than competition (950 grams)
maximum ISO low (800)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB35F Sports photography factors
Sigma SD10 Sports photography factors
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
36
max shutter speed is good (1/6,000s)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (3 megapixels)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB35F as a Travel photography camera
Sigma SD10 as a Travel photography camera
70
lighter than competition (194g)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long reach (288mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
29
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (950g)
MP count low (3 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB35F Landscape photography info
Sigma SD10 Landscape photography info
43
has manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
41
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (1.8 inches)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (3 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (800)
does not have Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Samsung WB35F
Vlogging with Sigma SD10
31
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic jack
9
can't shoot video
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma SD10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB35F and Sigma SD10
 Samsung WB35FSigma SD10
General Information
Brand Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung WB35F Sigma SD10
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Introduced 2014-01-07 2004-03-19
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 3 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 2268 x 1512
Maximum native ISO 3200 800
Maximum enhanced ISO - 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 24-288mm (12.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.1-6.3 -
Total lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.7
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 1.8 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 130 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 98%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.77x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/6000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194g (0.43 pounds) 950g (2.09 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model BP70A -
Self timer - Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC Compact Flash Type I or II
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $130 $198