Clicky

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37
Samsung WB35F front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Launched January 2014
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Released February 2016
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Following is a in depth analysis of the Samsung WB35F and Sigma Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the WB35F (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the WB35F (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The WB35F was manufactured 3 years earlier than the Quattro which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the WB35F scores versus the Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sigma Quattro

 WB35F Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung WB35F

 Quattro WB35F 
ReleasedFebruary 2016January 2014More modern by 25 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1620k230kClearer screen (+1390k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sigma Quattro

 WB35F Quattro 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB35F has external measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Compare the Samsung WB35F and Sigma Quattro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the WB35F and the Quattro.

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WB35F and Quattro is 93 and 63 respectively.

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes simply by going over specs. The image underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WB35F and Quattro.

All in all, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WB35F featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sigma Quattro will deliver greater detail due to its extra 13MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged WB35F is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Samsung WB35F
Portrait photography with Sigma Quattro
37
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
81
manual focus
excellent megapixels (29MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports face detect focus
supports RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Samsung WB35F Street photography details
Sigma Quattro Street photography details
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
59
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
heavier than others in class (625 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Samsung WB35F
Sports photography with Sigma Quattro
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
70
excellent megapixels (29 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports tracking focus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
low frames per second (3.8 fps)
does not have image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB35F Travel photography information
Sigma Quattro Travel photography information
70
lighter than competition (194g)
good MP (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long zoom (288mm)
lack of Timelapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.1)
55
environment sealing
excellent megapixels (29MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than others in class (625g)
display isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB35F Landscape photography advice
Sigma Quattro Landscape photography advice
43
has manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
72
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen is a good size (3")
excellent megapixels (29MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Samsung WB35F
Vlogging with Sigma Quattro
31
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone jack
22
supports face detect focus
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video ( pxls)
doesn't have mic port
heavier than others in class (625 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung WB35F vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB35F and Sigma Quattro
 Samsung WB35FSigma sd Quattro
General Information
Company Samsung Sigma
Model Samsung WB35F Sigma sd Quattro
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2014-01-07 2016-02-23
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 29 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 24-288mm (12.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.1-6.3 -
Total lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dot 1,620k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed - 3.8fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash modes - no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194 grams (0.43 pounds) 625 grams (1.38 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model BP70A BP-61
Self timer - Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $130 $738