Clicky

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A300

Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37
Samsung WB35F front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Launched January 2014
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Revealed January 2008
  • Replacement is Sony A330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A300 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Samsung WB35F vs Sony A300, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the WB35F (16MP) and A300 (10MP) and the WB35F (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The WB35F was introduced 6 years after the A300 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the WB35F scores vs the A300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony A300

 WB35F A300 
RevealedJanuary 2014January 2008Newer by 73 months

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Samsung WB35F

 A300 WB35F 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony A300

 WB35F A300 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Screen sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent screen measurements
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Samsung WB35F has got outer measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sony A300 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

See the Samsung WB35F vs Sony A300 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the WB35F and the A300.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A300 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the WB35F and A300 is 93 and 64 respectively.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The pic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WB35F and A300.

As you can plainly see, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WB35F having a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Samsung WB35F will offer greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The younger WB35F is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Samsung WB35F
Portrait photography with Sony A300
37
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
59
focusing manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Samsung WB35F Street photography factors
Sony A300 Street photography factors
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (194g)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
74
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB35F Sports photography information
Sony A300 Sports photography information
40
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
54
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with phase detect auto focus
low fps (3.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Samsung WB35F
Travel photography with Sony A300
70
lighter than average (194g)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
great reach (288mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
45
built-in flash
no Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB35F Landscape photography details
Sony A300 Landscape photography details
43
has manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
57
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
no Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB35F as a Vlogging camera
Sony A300 as a Vlogging camera
31
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (194 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic socket
9
no video shooting
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB35F and Sony A300
 Samsung WB35FSony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB35F Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2014-01-07 2008-01-30
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 3872 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 24-288mm (12.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.1-6.3 -
Total lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings - Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194 grams (0.43 lb) 632 grams (1.39 lb)
Dimensions 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 64
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.4
DXO Low light score not tested 538
Other
Battery model BP70A -
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC Compact Flash
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $130 $0