Clicky

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A390

Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37
Samsung WB35F front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front
Portability
66
Imaging
53
Features
54
Overall
53

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A390 Key Specs

Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2014
Sony A390
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Revealed July 2010
  • Old Model is Sony A380
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A390 Overview

Here, we are comparing the Samsung WB35F and Sony A390, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB35F (16MP) and the A390 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the WB35F (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The WB35F was unveiled 3 years after the A390 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the WB35F grades vs the A390 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony A390

 WB35F A390 
RevealedJanuary 2014July 2010More modern by 42 months

Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Samsung WB35F

 A390 WB35F 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony A390

 WB35F A390 
Manual focus More precise focus
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display measurement
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB35F has got external dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sony A390 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

See the Samsung WB35F and Sony A390 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the WB35F against the A390.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A390 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB35F and A390 is 93 and 66 respectively.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by checking out specs. The pic underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB35F and A390.

All in all, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WB35F having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Samsung WB35F will show greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent WB35F will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB35F Portrait photography highlights
Sony A390 Portrait photography highlights
37
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
71
manual focus
resolution is good (14MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers face detection focus
delivers RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Samsung WB35F as a Street photography camera
Sony A390 as a Street photography camera
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (194 grams)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
75
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB35F Sports photography details
Sony A390 Sports photography details
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
59
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (14MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
terrible battery life (230 CIPA)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB35F Travel photography info
Sony A390 Travel photography info
70
lighter than competition in class (194 grams)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
great zoom (288mm)
missing Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.1)
53
resolution is good (14MP)
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse mode
terrible battery life (230 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB35F as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A390 as a Landscape photography camera
43
you can focus manually
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
61
manual focus
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.7")
terrible battery life (230 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Samsung WB35F
Vlogging with Sony A390
31
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (194 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone socket
9
no video
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A390 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB35F and Sony A390
 Samsung WB35FSony Alpha DSLR-A390
General Information
Brand Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB35F Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2014-01-07 2010-07-28
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4592 x 3056
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 24-288mm (12.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.1-6.3 -
Number of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of display 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194 gr (0.43 pounds) 549 gr (1.21 pounds)
Physical dimensions 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 66
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 607
Other
Battery life - 230 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model BP70A NP-FH50
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots One One
Cost at release $130 $500