Clicky

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A900

Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37
Samsung WB35F front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front
Portability
54
Imaging
66
Features
62
Overall
64

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A900 Key Specs

Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Released January 2014
Sony A900
(Full Review)
  • 25MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
  • Introduced October 2008
  • Newer Model is Sony A99
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A900 Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Samsung WB35F and Sony A900, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the WB35F (16MP) and A900 (25MP) and the WB35F (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) come with different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The WB35F was released 5 years later than the A900 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the WB35F matches up against the A900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony A900

 WB35F A900 
IntroducedJanuary 2014October 2008More recent by 64 months

Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Samsung WB35F

 A900 WB35F 
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution922k230kCrisper screen (+692k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony A900

 WB35F A900 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB35F enjoys external dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sony A900 has proportions of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).

Contrast the Samsung WB35F and Sony A900 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the WB35F and the A900.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A900 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WB35F and A900 is 93 and 54 respectively.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by going through specifications. The visual here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WB35F and A900.

To sum up, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WB35F featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Sony A900 will produce extra detail as a result of its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent WB35F provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB35F as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A900 as a Portrait photography camera
37
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
71
has manual focus
excellent MP (25MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
saves RAW files
no liveview feature
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung WB35F
Street photography with Sony A900
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (194g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
screen is fixed
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB35F as a Sports photography camera
Sony A900 as a Sports photography camera
40
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
70
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
excellent MP (25MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
environment sealing
has phase detect AF
no liveview feature
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames per second)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB35F Travel photography features
Sony A900 Travel photography features
70
lighter than others (194 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
great reach (288mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
54
environment sealing
excellent MP (25 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB35F Landscape photography advice
Sony A900 Landscape photography advice
43
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
72
has manual focus
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
excellent MP (25 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
has double storage slots
no liveview feature
lack of Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB35F Vlogging features
Sony A900 Vlogging features
31
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (194 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic support
9
can't record video
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Samsung WB35F vs Sony A900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB35F and Sony A900
 Samsung WB35FSony Alpha DSLR-A900
General Information
Make Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB35F Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Released 2014-01-07 2008-10-22
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 25MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 6048 x 4032
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 24-288mm (12.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.1-6.3 -
Total lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 922k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - TFT Xtra Fine color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194g (0.43 lb) 895g (1.97 lb)
Dimensions 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 79
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.3
DXO Low light score not tested 1431
Other
Battery life - 880 pictures
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model BP70A NP-FM500H
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Storage slots 1 2
Pricing at launch $130 $2,736