Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
89 Imaging
53 Features
55 Overall
53
Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced June 2010
- Updated by Sony NEX-C3
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3 Overview
The following is a extended review of the Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WB35F (16MP) and the NEX-3 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the WB35F (1/2.3") and NEX-3 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WB35F was manufactured 3 years after the NEX-3 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the WB35F scores versus the NEX-3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB35F & Sony Alpha NEX-3. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung WB35F Gallery & Sony NEX-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony NEX-3
| WB35F | NEX-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 | June 2010 | Newer by 44 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3 over the Samsung WB35F
| NEX-3 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony NEX-3
| WB35F | NEX-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB35F comes with exterior measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3 has measurements of 117mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 297 grams (0.65 lbs).
See the Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the WB35F against the NEX-3.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the WB35F and NEX-3 is 93 and 89 respectively.
Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by seeing technical specs. The image underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WB35F and NEX-3.
As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WB35F due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Samsung WB35F will provide more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The more modern WB35F will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3 Specifications
| Samsung WB35F | Sony Alpha NEX-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB35F | Sony Alpha NEX-3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2010-06-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) | 297 grams (0.65 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 68 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.0 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 830 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP70A | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $130 | $0 |