Clicky

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3N

Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37
Samsung WB35F front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-3N front
Portability
89
Imaging
57
Features
52
Overall
55

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs

Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Sony NEX-3N
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
  • Announced February 2013
  • Succeeded the Sony NEX-F3
  • Newer Model is Sony a5000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3N Overview

The following is a in depth comparison of the Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3N, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB35F (16MP) and the NEX-3N (16MP) is very comparable but the WB35F (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The WB35F was revealed 11 months after the NEX-3N so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a concise summation of how the WB35F grades against the NEX-3N when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony NEX-3N

 WB35F NEX-3N 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014February 2013Newer by 11 months

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Samsung WB35F

 NEX-3N WB35F 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony NEX-3N

 WB35F NEX-3N 
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison

If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB35F has external measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has proportions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Check out the Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3N in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the WB35F compared to the NEX-3N.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB35F and NEX-3N is 93 and 89 respectively.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specs. The picture here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WB35F and NEX-3N.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer the same exact megapixels but not the same sensor dimensions. The WB35F uses the smaller sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field trickier. The newer WB35F will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB35F Portrait photography advice
Sony NEX-3N Portrait photography advice
37
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
66
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
can't use external flash
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung WB35F
Street photography with Sony NEX-3N
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (194 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
77
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lack of image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Samsung WB35F
Sports photography with Sony NEX-3N
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
53
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
good battery (480 shots)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
lack of phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB35F Travel photography factors
Sony NEX-3N Travel photography factors
70
lighter than average in class (194g)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
71
good battery (480 shots)
resolution is good (16MP)
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Samsung WB35F
Landscape photography with Sony NEX-3N
43
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
70
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
good battery (480 per charge)
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB35F as a Vlogging camera
Sony NEX-3N as a Vlogging camera
31
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (194g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone support
28
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Samsung WB35F vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB35F and Sony NEX-3N
 Samsung WB35FSony Alpha NEX-3N
General Information
Brand Name Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB35F Sony Alpha NEX-3N
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2014-01-07 2013-02-25
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 3200 16000
Lowest native ISO 80 200
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 25
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 24-288mm (12.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.1-6.3 -
Available lenses - 121
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 4.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194 gr (0.43 pounds) 269 gr (0.59 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 74
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.5
DXO Low light score not tested 1067
Other
Battery life - 480 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model BP70A NPFW50
Time lapse feature
Type of storage MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $130 $399