Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6100
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f91/52f9140fa7006285dc43ba7d1f1fb45d41f5684b" alt="Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71331/71331852736517df50ca02db3d34c0b3327a5b74" alt="Sony Alpha a6100 front Sony Alpha a6100 front"
81 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Push to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 396g - 120 x 67 x 59mm
- Introduced August 2019
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6100 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Samsung WB35F versus Sony A6100, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the WB35F (16MP) and A6100 (24MP) and the WB35F (1/2.3") and A6100 (APS-C) boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WB35F was manufactured 6 years prior to the A6100 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sony A6100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the WB35F grades versus the A6100 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6100 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB35F & Sony Alpha a6100. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung WB35F Gallery & Sony A6100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony A6100
WB35F | A6100 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6100 over the Samsung WB35F
A6100 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2019 | ![]() | January 2014 | More modern by 68 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony A6100
WB35F | A6100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6100 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung WB35F enjoys outside measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony A6100 has sizing of 120mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check out the Samsung WB35F versus Sony A6100 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the WB35F versus the A6100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d37fb/d37fb2209274ee196e307256e5bd24e6898ab54d" alt="Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6100 size comparison Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6100 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WB35F and A6100 is 93 and 81 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a72f6/a72f6521d07f1859899f233bc35d9e66c2537de3" alt="Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6100 top view buttons comparison Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6100 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6100 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the WB35F and A6100.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WB35F because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony A6100 will provide more detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged WB35F will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/885b7/885b7e521fc7fb33e72afc84cf066db28f227753" alt="Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6100 sensor size comparison Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6100 sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7c1e/d7c1e4b521a144fb3faf73665d70e52c9d6df339" alt="Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Samsung WB35F vs Sony A6100 Specifications
Samsung WB35F | Sony Alpha a6100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB35F | Sony Alpha a6100 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-01-07 | 2019-08-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 32000 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 425 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | - | Flash off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless, hi-speed |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 396 grams (0.87 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 120 x 67 x 59mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP70A | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $130 | $748 |