Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX1
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
67 Imaging
32 Features
36 Overall
33
Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
- Announced April 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX1 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX1, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the WB35F (16MP) and HX1 (9MP) and the WB35F (1/2.3") and HX1 (1/2.4") use totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WB35F was launched 4 years later than the HX1 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the WB35F grades against the HX1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB35F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung WB35F Gallery and Sony HX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony HX1
| WB35F | HX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 | April 2009 | More recent by 58 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Samsung WB35F
| HX1 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony HX1
| WB35F | HX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB35F offers exterior dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony HX1 has proportions of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs).
Compare the Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the WB35F compared to the HX1.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the WB35F and HX1 is 93 and 67 respectively.
Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The visual underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB35F and HX1.
To sum up, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WB35F because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB35F will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The fresher WB35F is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX1 Specifications
| Samsung WB35F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB35F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2009-04-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 28-560mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/2.8-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 9.20 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1440x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) | 544 grams (1.20 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | BP70A | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $47,999 |