Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX200V
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
66 Imaging
41 Features
55 Overall
46
Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Released May 2012
- Old Model is Sony HX100V
- Updated by Sony HX300
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX200V Overview
Following is a extensive overview of the Samsung WB35F versus Sony HX200V, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB35F (16MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WB35F was revealed 21 months after the HX200V making them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the WB35F matches up against the HX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB35F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The full galleries are provided at Samsung WB35F Gallery and Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony HX200V
| WB35F | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | May 2012 | More modern by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Samsung WB35F
| HX200V | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony HX200V
| WB35F | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB35F offers outer dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has measurements of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") and a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Compare the Samsung WB35F versus Sony HX200V in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the WB35F against the HX200V.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the WB35F and HX200V is 93 and 66 respectively.
Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WB35F and HX200V.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Sony HX200V to render more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images more aggressively. The fresher WB35F should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung WB35F vs Sony HX200V Specifications
| Samsung WB35F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB35F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-01-07 | 2012-05-11 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 18MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.40 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lb) | 583 gr (1.29 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 450 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP70A | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $480 |