Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f91/52f9140fa7006285dc43ba7d1f1fb45d41f5684b" alt="Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/970a0/970a0f286487b4657a35be8286808dada18de767" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II front"
89 Imaging
50 Features
74 Overall
59
Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 281g - 102 x 58 x 38mm
- Announced June 2013
- Superseded the Sony RX100
- Replacement is Sony RX100 III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB35F (16MP) and the RX100 II (20MP) is relatively comparable but the WB35F (1/2.3") and RX100 II (1") feature totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WB35F was manufactured 7 months later than the RX100 II so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a concise summary of how the WB35F scores against the RX100 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung WB35F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung WB35F Gallery & Sony RX100 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony RX100 II
WB35F | RX100 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | June 2013 | Fresher by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 II over the Samsung WB35F
RX100 II | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony RX100 II
WB35F | RX100 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Samsung WB35F offers exterior measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 II has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") and a weight of 281 grams (0.62 lbs).
See the Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the WB35F against the RX100 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65f46/65f46b36284155986bd782f7a5bb7e6f05df1bbd" alt="Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II size comparison Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB35F and RX100 II is 93 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f488d/f488d6cae1e432c0b8975d0e40602675f9e24f94" alt="Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II top view buttons comparison Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by going through a spec sheet. The visual below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WB35F and RX100 II.
Clearly, both of those cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WB35F due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony RX100 II will show extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The fresher WB35F is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e632d/e632dc9ae4155842a5d2e8e5683a9b199ffa156b" alt="Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II sensor size comparison Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36085/36085e5f8f5dde71702308caa13d67ff4f5c5c5a" alt="Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Samsung WB35F vs Sony RX100 II Specifications
Samsung WB35F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB35F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-01-07 | 2013-06-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 160 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | Xtra Fine WhiteMagic TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 15.00 m (ISO Auto (W)) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) | 281 gr (0.62 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 483 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP70A | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec. / 2 sec. / Self-portrait One-person/ Self-portrait Two-person/ Self timer Continuous (3 or 5 shots)) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $130 | $598 |