Samsung WB35F vs Sony S2100
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f91/52f9140fa7006285dc43ba7d1f1fb45d41f5684b" alt="Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b24d7/b24d7d58bda9363e0bc59b94985873a84db39b53" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 front"
93 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Samsung WB35F vs Sony S2100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Announced January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Samsung WB35F vs Sony S2100 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Samsung WB35F and Sony S2100, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Samsung and Sony. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the WB35F (16MP) and S2100 (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The WB35F was brought out 4 years later than the S2100 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the WB35F grades versus the S2100 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Samsung WB35F vs Sony S2100 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB35F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100. The entire galleries are available at Samsung WB35F Gallery and Sony S2100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony S2100
WB35F | S2100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 49 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony S2100 over the Samsung WB35F
S2100 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony S2100
WB35F | S2100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Samsung WB35F vs Sony S2100 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung WB35F comes with exterior measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony S2100 has dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Samsung WB35F and Sony S2100 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the WB35F compared to the S2100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aab11/aab112acb046ad5b78abb5ee854d5535ca89d2dc" alt="Samsung WB35F vs Sony S2100 size comparison Samsung WB35F vs Sony S2100 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WB35F and S2100 is 93 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07695/07695021740ffc170a9e9973ae2407e30a80f2f6" alt="Samsung WB35F vs Sony S2100 top view buttons comparison Samsung WB35F vs Sony S2100 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung WB35F vs Sony S2100 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing only by researching specs. The photograph here may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WB35F and S2100.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Samsung WB35F to result in extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots more aggressively. The newer WB35F should have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2279e/2279e0dc7812c6002e50232f4ef949f233713af8" alt="Samsung WB35F vs Sony S2100 sensor size comparison Samsung WB35F vs Sony S2100 sensor size comparison"
Samsung WB35F vs Sony S2100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0453d/0453dcd763cf934083fc35d296fc981c7686c0f7" alt="Samsung WB35F vs Sony S2100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB35F vs Sony S2100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Samsung WB35F vs Sony S2100 Specifications
Samsung WB35F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB35F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-01-07 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 1 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.30 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 167 grams (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | BP70A | 2 x AA |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $130 | $0 |