Samsung WB35F vs Sony T900
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Samsung WB35F vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung WB35F vs Sony T900 Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Samsung WB35F and Sony T900, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the WB35F (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WB35F was brought out 4 years after the T900 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the WB35F matches up against the T900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung WB35F vs Sony T900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB35F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung WB35F Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony T900
| WB35F | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 60 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Samsung WB35F
| T900 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony T900
| WB35F | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Samsung WB35F vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Samsung WB35F has external measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung WB35F and Sony T900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the WB35F vs the T900.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the WB35F and T900 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Samsung WB35F vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by viewing technical specs. The pic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WB35F and T900.
As you have seen, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB35F to render extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher WB35F should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB35F vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung WB35F vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Samsung WB35F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung WB35F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-01-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lb) | 143 gr (0.32 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP70A | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $130 | $300 |